The Star Citizen Thread v5

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Oh wow, just found something, this is nice:

THIS is a Polaris concept picture for Star Citizen, which is now for sale for more than 700$:
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/jv2ayxfguiu57r/source/Polaris-Landed.jpg

And THIS is a Garencieres-Class space freighter from the Gundam anime universe:
(http://gundam.wikia.com/wiki/Garencieres)
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/gundam/images/d/d8/Garencieres.jpg

Yes they nick a lot of stuff from others, well only a copyright lawsuit will stop that, tic tac toc.
 
I've just been reading through the Polaris threads in https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen , and I find the whole reasoning of some people, the justification for putting down more than 700 Dollars for some JPEGs and GIFs of something that might never actually be real, deeply disturbing.

When asked about that, a lot of these "ship" collectors say "Yeah well, we're not actually buying these ships, we're investing in the continued development of the project. The ships themselves don't really matter to us". That would all be perfectly fine if you have the money, except it doesn't reflect the thought process behind buying these concept ships. Among themselves, in their own forums, these guys spend hours debating what "role" these "ships" will have in their "organisation", if the shields will be strong enough, every last detail in the concept pictures is discussed. They dream about gameplay with these ships that isn't even in the concept stage. They dream about "deep space, long range combat corvettes", when the first star system of the game isn't even half complete. In their minds, in the belief system that is Star Citizen, they really are buying ships, with capabilities and gameplay that doesn't exist anywhere except in their imagination.

In the past, I had some experiences with members of Scientology, and the thought processes behind investing in these dreams seem very similar to me. So I think the term "cult" is really appropriate, at least for some members of their community.

CR is selling dream and they are ready to buy. In real life it is called scamming.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Nooooooo waaaaay....you are saying Chris lied when said 3.0 might come at the end of the year while clearly knowing it won't happen? And 2.6 is not coming in "few weeks" as CIG has indicated?

NO WAY Sir, NO WAY.
 
Last edited:
Yes they nick a lot of stuff from others, well only a copyright lawsuit will stop that, tic tac toc.

That's just FUD, misinformation and conspiracies theories put about by big game developers like Derek Smart who are conspiring against star citizen because they are threatened and jealous you hater.

I can state categorically and objectively that there's nothing blatantly pinched from other better sci-fi in the whole of the *verse.



*press <<use>> to pinch stuff from Joss Whedon.
 
Yes they nick a lot of stuff from others, well only a copyright lawsuit will stop that, tic tac toc.

I am all for influences, evolution, I am not strong believer in hardcore copyright/trademark enforcement.

But this is obviously used as reference, and it just above that line between infringement.
 
RSI Polaris Stats (from presale)
8NS3bGa.jpg
 
Last edited:

jcrg99

Banned
I don't get it either. By the time these ships are flyable the game will have been out for quite some time during which they could save UEC and buy it that way. Do they really need to contribute more money to a project that already has a staggering $125 million?

According to Roberts a $125 million development budget was meant to be comparable to a publishers gross budget of $500 million or more. If they can't produce the game they want with that figure then something is seriously wrong.

I recently saw Louis Theroux's new scientology film and the parallels between those people's behaviour and some of these people's behaviour was quite surprising. Defintely cultish aspects.

The worst part of this is that are their contributions followed by lack of exigency which caused the flop of this game/project/company (yes... its so I used the past sentence).

Its like to gift that son that only fails with you, at school, or cause general problems. Instead doing the normal and requiring him to behave, to learn, to improve, to be humble and better human, you will continue to applaud him and even show how proud you are by his attitude with girls or how he is violent with other students, or how drunk or high he went home, or how awesome was the velocity that he is getting with his motorcycle in the streets, etc.

You know that by the attitude, your son probably will grow as a terrible human being which does not care with anything but himself, but also weak, depressive, lost, without focus or insight or respect to his limits and losing easily by any other more serious and better educated human beign, in any competitive situation.
 
Last edited:
Yes they nick a lot of stuff from others, well only a copyright lawsuit will stop that, tic tac toc.

Nah, to be fair this is what happens when you go for generic sci-fi looks. That it matches so well with other sci-fi franchises is just a natural result.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

RSI Polaris Stats (from presale)

Quick question: any info on what the minimum crew requirement is?
 
Quick question: any info on what the minimum crew requirement is?

That's irrelevant. No one knows how many people in one instance the game will actually support, what gameplay those players will find in a big ship, if anyone is willing to play in these kinds of crew roles, or if you will actually be able to find enough people in the final game to crew these ships.

Any number on the concept JPEGs is just that, a number. It is 13, btw.
 
Oh wow, just found something, this is nice:

THIS is a Polaris concept picture for Star Citizen, which is now for sale for more than 700$:
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/jv2ayxfguiu57r/source/Polaris-Landed.jpg

And THIS is a Garencieres-Class space freighter from the Gundam anime universe:
(http://gundam.wikia.com/wiki/Garencieres)
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/gundam/images/d/d8/Garencieres.jpg

From that angle, it looks similar. But if you look at the Garencieres from any other angle... you see it's a triangular ship:

60mecha_L.png


While the polaris is more like a flat rectangle:

03EPfq0.jpg


Sorry for spoiling your fun, guys.
 
That's irrelevant. No one knows how many people in one instance the game will actually support, what gameplay those players will find in a big ship, if anyone is willing to play in these kinds of crew roles, or if you will actually be able to find enough people in the final game to crew these ships.

Any number on the concept JPEGs is just that, a number. It is 13, btw.

Well, not really. If it is '1', that means someone can fly that ship on its own. If its more than one, having crew mates run off to take care of kids/dinner/whatever will have you floating in space like an asteroid. I would like to know if it will be like ED (multi-crew optional) or not (multi-crew mandatory). And if the latter, how these mechanics will be.

But as you said, its currently just a jpeg. :(
 
From that angle, it looks similar. But if you look at the Garencieres from any other angle... you see it's a triangular ship:
While the polaris is more like a flat rectangle:

Yeah, so what, it's 750$!
For that kind of money, one would expect an original design that looks original from any angle, no?

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

I would like to know if it will be like ED (multi-crew optional) or not (multi-crew mandatory). And if the latter, how these mechanics will be.

Yeah, well, we don't.
We don't know. That's the point I was making with "irrelevant". At this point, there are no mechanics, no gameplay in place. And they are selling ships as if this gameplay was already developed. That's the core of the problem, in my opinion.
 
Quick question: any info on what the minimum crew requirement is?

According to CIG the crew is 13-24.

The ship has 5 manned turrets, a control panel in the torpedo bay, another control panel for engineering, and 5 control panels on the bridge. That makes 12 people. Not sure if the captain or pilot is counted among them.
Although i guess that it will be a bit like the freelancer, so you can "fly" the ship with just a pilot, and shoot with the automated turret (it has an automated turret). But with only a pilot you won't be able to control the power distribution, shield distribution, damage control, the 5 manned turrets, etc... and the polaris will surely be much less maneouverable than a fighter ship, so you would be an easy prey if flying solo with that ship. You need 7-8 people at the very least to maximize its combat capabilities.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't there a stream last night? Anyone got a summary? Tried reading back through the thread but so far can't find any mention.

To be fair, not really. It was somewhat of an 'non-official stream with one dude from CIG and some others' from what I gathered. They played the current live build, no real news of any kind. Think of it as a pre-con event where SC fans were having fun together. Apparantly things like "thats the greatest thing of SC, the magic happens in your mind!" were said and such. Real news coming tomorrow.
 
Wasn't there a stream last night? Anyone got a summary? Tried reading back through the thread but so far can't find any mention.
Summary for what i saw was following.
A girl gamer boots up arena commander. gets killed and is forced to watch mans butt wiggle in center of screen.
Some other streamer is stressed as canadian mounted police officer.

and thats about it. Maybe theres more on sunday, who knows
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom