Modes These arguments are tedious.

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

ALGOMATIC

Banned
Nice try, but I don't PP. So I neither fortify or undermine.

In fact I've been quite Open about doing passenger missions in and around Founders for the past 3 to 4 weeks in Open Mode and being completely safe doing it in my unarmed space coach.

As for multiplayer balance, if we remove PvP it is completely balanced.
It lame gankers going after unarmed targets in their engineered combat ships that makes multiplayer unbalanced.
If you want real multiplayer balance, you should support removing all PvP and pushing it into CQC - which is a balanced area for PvP.

Open mode is very balanced if you know what you are doing. The unbalance comes from solo underminers.

CQC is trash that should be abandoned.
 

Prole 217

Banned
Router manipulation is cheating, go ahead and cheat who cares.

The existence of a PP subform doesnt mean it wasnt a failure. Its being used for module shopping.

Traders have more than enough defences if they stop running shieldess.

The statement was that the default setting on the router could lead to that situation, why are you accusing me of cheating?
I just press the WPS button on my router thats about as technical as I get with the thing.
And to go along with it they also said block lists, which i guess are in the game, could also negate the risk of open, so rather than try to reward a whole mode, for dubious risk, why not make it only for actual pvp encounters.

Also why not give the trader some real defensive ability rather than just run? That could then at least make there be some, small though it may be, to the attacker, you know more interesting.
 
Nice try, but I don't PP. So I neither fortify or undermine.

In fact I've been quite Open about doing passenger missions in and around Founders for the past 3 to 4 weeks in Open Mode and being completely safe doing it in my unarmed space coach.

As for multiplayer balance, if we remove PvP it is completely balanced.
It lame gankers going after unarmed targets in their engineered combat ships that makes multiplayer unbalanced.
If you want real multiplayer balance, you should support removing all PvP and pushing it into CQC - which is a balanced area for PvP.

This.
The outright removal of PvP from the main game environment and it being placed in CQC where it belongs is the only real way forward.
Then FD can balance away to their hearts content in CQC while leaving the main game free of that kind of drivel.
We probably will get some awesome solo PvE content when we don't have to worry about the Fun Police [yesnod]
 
Haven't you said the exact same thing?

Something along the lines you don't care if others think that taking a PvP murdermachine against a mission runner isn't fair?

Pot. Meet kettle.

This started with me quoting him: "I don't care why you bought this game". So when I return the favour I get judged :)

I dont care why you bought this game. If you are in open I will make you my content so you better learn to enjoy it.
 
Last edited:
I fly in Open when I am out in The Black. If I were to ever see anyone I would expect them to be, like me, an explorer, not a child bent on damaging anything they can. However, once I am near the bubble, or near Colonia, I go back to Mobius. In those places there are just too many people whose idea of fun is to chase other players out of the game. . . A bit like playing king of the mountain; yet they feel like winners when no one else even wants their little dirt mound.

No one wants to play with them and it makes them feel bad. People keep trying to change th erules to force people to play witht em. The reality is that the thing that needs to change is the childrens behaviour, not the rules of the game.
 

ALGOMATIC

Banned
I fly in Open when I am out in The Black. If I were to ever see anyone I would expect them to be, like me, an explorer, not a child bent on damaging anything they can. However, once I am near the bubble, or near Colonia, I go back to Mobius. In those places there are just too many people whose idea of fun is to chase other players out of the game. . . A bit like playing king of the mountain; yet they feel like winners when no one else even wants their little dirt mound.

No one wants to play with them and it makes them feel bad. People keep trying to change th erules to force people to play witht em. The reality is that the thing that needs to change is the childrens behaviour, not the rules of the game.

"No one wants to play with them", wish it was true. They do want to play with me only from the safety mode thats the whole point here.
 

ALGOMATIC

Banned
Haven't you said the exact same thing?

Something along the lines you don't care if others think that taking a PvP murdermachine against a mission runner isn't fair?

Pot. Meet kettle.

What are even comparing? I am in open availble for retaliation, being hunted, chased away or killed.

From the other side somebody trolling a PF while pressing the "I am invincible" button.
 
What are even comparing?
Wel ....
I dont care why you bought this game.
I don't care what you think is fair.


I am in open
In Eravate, targeting noobs ... (to be continued)

open available for retaliation, being hunted, chased away or killed.
All you are risking is a high wake. With that in mind, you still need to be chasing noobs. Excuse me if I'm not overwhelmed by your idea of fairness :)

From the other side somebody trolling a PF while pressing the "I am invincible" button.
In Eravate, targeting noobs in a sooped up engineered combat ship vs unexperienced non-combat vessels.
 
This started with me quoting him: "I don't care why you bought this game". So when I return the favour I get judged :)


1000 lbs of Cubeo Razorback Bacon.

"No one wants to play with them", wish it was true. They do want to play with me only from the safety mode thats the whole point here.

Actions speak louder than words oh killer of "noobs" in Eravate, and people don't want to play with you. They want to play the game. They are not playing the game from any "safety mode" they are playing if anything in anti-griefing mode. And they are not playing with you or against you, they are playing against the environment and affecting the BGS.
 
The modes prevent having a balanced multiplayer content, and we have a proof in the form of PP failure. Squadrons will fail in a similar way, too bad they are waisting their time developing this.

If, PP failed it had nothing to do with the modes and all to do with the fact that people didn't enjoy it. I don't play it because the notion of merits in a space game seems stupid. If squadrons fail, it will be for the same lack of enjoyment reasons and nothing at all to do with user mode choice.
 

ALGOMATIC

Banned
Wel ....





In Eravate, targeting noobs ... (to be continued)


All you are risking is a high wake. With that in mind, you still need to be chasing noobs. Excuse me if I'm not overwhelmed by your idea of fairness :)


In Eravate, targeting noobs in a sooped up engineered combat ship vs unexperienced non-combat vessels.

I havent been in Eravate in a long time. My new hobby is stream sniping, 100% dedicated to that.
 

Prole 217

Banned
1000 lbs of Cubeo Razorback Bacon.



Actions speak louder than words oh killer of "noobs" in Eravate, and people don't want to play with you. They want to play the game. They are not playing the game from any "safety mode" they are playing if anything in anti-griefing mode. And they are not playing with you or against you, they are playing against the environment and affecting the BGS.

No, no what you dont understand is anyone who is playing the game is playing against him, he is after all the most important player, at least in his reality :).

But honestly you are all a figment of my imagination, just there to keep the voices in my head from becoming too much of a bother.
 

ALGOMATIC

Banned
No, no what you dont understand is anyone who is playing the game is playing against him, he is after all the most important player, at least in his reality :).

But honestly you are all a figment of my imagination, just there to keep the voices in my head from becoming too much of a bother.

How is that solo undermining moving along? You need any help?
 
Open mode is very balanced if you know what you are doing. The unbalance comes from solo underminers.

CQC is trash that should be abandoned.

The "unbalance" comes from people like you taking murder machines to starter systems.
You've done more damage to the game than any single "Solo undermining" will ever do.

CQC is real PvP that is balanced and fair, which is why you don't like it - because your targets get to shoot back.
 
How is that solo undermining moving along? You need any help?

The same old refrain. If the rules allow for undermining in Solo, it's all good. If the rules allow for Stream Sniping, get your jollies on. But, this whole 'shame on you, fame on me' stuffs is nothing but impotent attempts at childish peer pressure. How could anyone take your arguments about game mechanics as anything but drivel? It's not like you offer a lot of substance, besides your personal desire for more targets.
 

ALGOMATIC

Banned
The "unbalance" comes from people like you taking murder machines to starter systems.
You've done more damage to the game than any single "Solo undermining" will ever do.

CQC is real PvP that is balanced and fair, which is why you don't like it - because your targets get to shoot back.

Comparing killing a sidewinder with 0 rebuy to destroying a PF progress of few days.

The same old refrain. If the rules allow for undermining in Solo, it's all good. If the rules allow for Stream Sniping, get your jollies on. But, this whole 'shame on you, fame on me' stuffs is nothing but impotent attempts at childish peer pressure. How could anyone take your arguments about game mechanics as anything but drivel? It's not like you offer a lot of substance, besides your personal desire for more targets.

Good at least you admitted to be a solo underminer.
 
Comparing killing a sidewinder with 0 rebuy to destroying a PF progress of few days.

The PF can fight back with the BGS, how is a new player suppose to fight back Vs your engineered killing machine?

More chance of the new player quitting than the PF who can retaliate if they want to do so.
 

Goose4291

Banned
The "unbalance" comes from people like you taking murder machines to starter systems.

tenor.gif
 
Comparing killing a sidewinder with 0 rebuy to destroying a PF progress of few days.



Good at least you admitted to be a solo underminer.

Lol. Now I'll never be able to show my ship again.... How will I go on?

You know what? I do BGS stuff in a PG too. I'll tell you another non-secret, I chased SCD's PAF out of Wolfberg from a PG too. Oops, now I'll never get my merit badge.

Impotent attempts at peer pressure are just that, childish, and well... impotent.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom