It's a tolerated modification and not supported in any way.
On the first screen the part you circled is orange because by default, in unmodded game it's blue. It is not meant to be the same color as the rest of the UI. It's not a mistake on the part of FDev, it's your lack of understanding of how the recoloring works.
It just blows my mind that you good folks are even arguing against me. Forget about whether this is supported or not, either way it's a mess in the current state. Can we not agree upon that at least?![]()
On the first screen the part you circled is orange because by default, in unmodded game it's blue. It is not meant to be the same color as the rest of the UI. It's not a mistake on the part of FDev, it's your lack of understanding of how the recoloring works.
The UI in 3.3 is distinctly lacking quality control.
Example 1: https://i.imgur.com/yuiX2Qd.jpg
UI elements are not adhering to global color override
Example 2: https://i.imgur.com/rJigEEb.jpg
Again, most of the FSS is not adhering to color override, perhaps worse is UI elements covered by other UI elements.
I'm pretty sure this was reported during the beta and I am quite disappointed this hasn't been fixed before release.
Thank You![]()
It's not modding, it's an "officially" supported way of changing HUD colors for people who are colorbind and/or object to orange. And again, I repeat the message, if you are going to allow people to modify HUD colors, change them all, not just some random elements. Change them all or none at all.
What I am saying is factually correct, with screenshot evidence. I agree with you that there should be a proper in-game method of changing colors but that is for a different discussion.
It's not a "hack" or a "mod".. It's clearly an intentional design decision written into the code to read that file if it exists. It may not be supported, but at some point during development there was an intentional effort to check for the existence of the override file, read it, and adhere to the policy defined within.
It's not a "hack" or a "mod".. It's clearly an intentional design decision written into the code to read that file if it exists. It may not be supported, but at some point during development there was an intentional effort to check for the existence of the override file, read it, and adhere to the policy defined within.
12.4 If we fail to insist that you perform any of your obligations under this EULA, or if we do not enforce our rights against you, or if we delay in doing so, that will not mean that we have waived our rights against you and will not mean that you do not have to comply with those obligations.
You are not permitted:
(b) except as expressly permitted by this EULA and to the extent expressly permitted by applicable law, to rent, lease, sub-license, loan, exploit for profit or gain, copy, modify, adapt, merge, translate, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or create derivative works based on the whole or any part of the Game or use, reproduce, distribute, translate, broadcast, publicly perform, store in a retrieval system or otherwise deal in the Game or any part thereof in any way;
Almost certainly a modified colour scheme is a derivative work based on part of the game, as you're taking the existing colour configuration data and changing it. If you can tell me the part of the EULA that expressly permits this, by all means do so.(b) except as expressly permitted by this EULA ... modify, ... or create derivative works based on the whole or any part of the Game or use, reproduce, ...or otherwise deal in the Game or any part thereof in any way;
You've modded the game. Don't complain about QC.
That is single most funniest thing I've read today!!
The bit about there being any QC I mean...
As for modding the game? Which part did he modify? The game executable? The memory? The Net Encryption stack? Oh! You mean the configuration file!!
Let me educate you... Configuration allows you to 'configure' things the way you might like.
Modded the game... Lmao
LOL, funny that nobody realised it while everyone was arguing if modding a file is a mod or not.
Let me educate you... Configuration allows you to 'configure' things the way you might like.
It may be entirely intentional to include a folder where overrides get put. In that way, FD can rapidly roll out rapid hotfixes if required, or offer alternate arrangements if something in the game's code breaks a particular hardware/software configuration.
It's almost certainly not intended for users to go ahead and do whatever the heck they want with it, and is most definitely "hacking" or "modding" the game. FD just tolerate it because it's a harmless effect that actually provides some benefit to the player, but is most definitely a condition which FD could turn around and say "This is no longer permitted" i.e this bit of the EULA:
Also from the EULA:
And boiling it down to the key parts:
Almost certainly a modified colour scheme is a derivative work based on part of the game, as you're taking the existing colour configuration data and changing it. If you can tell me the part of the EULA that expressly permits this, by all means do so.
Otherwise, changing the colour shcemes is not intended or supported use of the game... FD just don't actively prevent it.
No, unless FD officially provided it to the users as the means to change the hud color, but they never did. He made use of an undocumented feature. Try to do with any API and you on your own, at best.