Patch Notes Update Update 1.1.06 Incoming - 15.30 GMT
- Thread starter Michael Brookes
- Start date
- Status
Thanks for the update.
Just wondering if it would be possible to perhaps add a hyperlink in the launch news item that takes us to these threads (so we can easily find the details)?
Would save navigating to find it in the forums.
Just wondering if it would be possible to perhaps add a hyperlink in the launch news item that takes us to these threads (so we can easily find the details)?
Would save navigating to find it in the forums.
What category? Mine's been untouched for a month and I even had a video.
From what I can tell, these stutters are not down to the game performance itself, it seems like the game periodically "hangs" between frames while waiting from a response from the server/instance, so I don't think this will get better until they improve their instancing/network code.
seems like they're more or less ignoring any tickets from before the new procedure was put in place unless you update the ticket (and they aren't telling people, in hopes they wont re-submit/update, so they can just ignore them and continue working through new ones).
Anyone have any more info about the story/text updates? noticed any difference? just corrections to spelling etc or actual content improvement?
Last edited:
Er... no.
Satellite broadband is high latency (long packet transmission time) and high bandwidth (lots of data can arrive quickly) and can be quite reliable.
The examples quoted in that link is too simple and only covers the negotiation steps for packets, and not the data transmission steps for packets. It is high packet loss that causes network retries. As a reliable protocol tries to cope with an unreliable network it will also reduce the amount of data transmission.
So the connection from Pakistan probably has high packet loss, and so high bandwidth won't help (see RFC1180 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1180 though this is intended for a technical audience).
Packet loss can be checked with a tool like WinMTR - highly recommended for checking network reliability, packet loss over 5% typically gives a very frustrating slow down experience for the end user.
Last edited:
I had a previous ticket for this issue which was under |Technical Support, untouched since 23/2.
I closed off that one and opened one under Technical Support, Loss , Lost Ship category.
Can't remember the exact menu but you'll find it. Quote your previous ticket as well as date/time of the incident and open a new one. Close you old one of course so we don't spam these guys
To those people suffering wih slow, intermittant and just plain old not downloading problems, I firmly recommend that you take a look at the FAQ on slow downloading (to be honest there is a lot of waffle there about AV etc, however the one nugget of info that made a huge difference to my dowmloads was this:
Unchecking that box turned my no download speed into a 3Mb/s speed - I'm on fibre if it worked for me, it may be good for all you other commanders out there in the same situation
Unchecking that box turned my no download speed into a 3Mb/s speed - I'm on fibre if it worked for me, it may be good for all you other commanders out there in the same situation
Raise a ticket and make sure you use "cannot play game " or similar ,cant remember the exact wording. https://support.elitedangerous.com/kb/
Also check windows firewall or whatever firewall you are using and make sure ED and watchdog have permissions
Last edited:
the debug camera is only available in the 1.2 beta at the moment and wont be usable in the main game until 1.2 is publicly released.
I echo that question... I raised a ticket 00000041172 and have not had a whiff of acknowledgement other than this thread that a problem existed.
Last edited:
Thanks for the update!
I wasn't expecting anything on the release branch until after 1.2 is merged in. I can't say I envy you guys having to deal with two moving targets!
I wasn't expecting anything on the release branch until after 1.2 is merged in. I can't say I envy you guys having to deal with two moving targets!
Thanks for all the great updates you guys have been putting into the game. Ever since you guys did away with endless pirate spawns in planetary rings I've been doing conflict zones which are way more fun.
Just a heads up that destroying enemy ships in conflict zones by targeting critical subsystems before their hull reaches 0% does not provide any sort of combat bond. Learned this destroying an Anaconda. Hope you can squeeze a fix into the next patch.
Just a heads up that destroying enemy ships in conflict zones by targeting critical subsystems before their hull reaches 0% does not provide any sort of combat bond. Learned this destroying an Anaconda. Hope you can squeeze a fix into the next patch.
Thanks, I refiled it under the new classification. Should hopefully speed up the refund.
- Status