I think i shall save all of mine to put towards a FLEET CARRIER paint job.I’m getting the 1ARX bobblehead just so salty posters in 5 years time can call me Hitler, like they have done with Cobra Mk IV owners.
I think i shall save all of mine to put towards a FLEET CARRIER paint job.I’m getting the 1ARX bobblehead just so salty posters in 5 years time can call me Hitler, like they have done with Cobra Mk IV owners.
First: Congrats!!!I especially liked the light bulb moment in the above picture post.
View attachment 143789
Spent the evening dodging another bullet around Sag A*,taking pictures,although they don't do justice to the experience of flying round it.Some very unusual effects, but even sitting watching it's
hard to get my head round what is being rendered in front of my
very eyes, and the awesome processes they represent.
View attachment 143790
I was more cautious on my approach,this time.Flying with orbit lines off , i don't know if i hit an exclusion zone or the event horizon,but i was flying externally taking shots when i was yanked back to cockpit view with all bells and whistles .
View attachment 143791
My PD took the brunt of it ,and after repairing the worst hit modules i scuttled off back to EA to turn in my codex discoveries.
View attachment 143792
It's a pretty easy trip from Colonia, as much as any trip is safe.I thought it was much further than it seemed.As for the fuel scooping,i have never really understood the issue.But that just makes my glass half full.Under the old ADS system,maybe, but my refuel time is hardly ever wasted time and a system devoid of planetary bodies is a stepping stone to somewhere else.First: Congrats!!!
Secondly: Yes that is a special place and a very weird thing. Black holes are mindbendingly interesting. You are supposed to be able to survive passing through the event horizon of Sag A*, but not the smaller ones, due to spaghettification. You will still die shortly after passing the horizon, but like W. C. Fields said about drowning in gin, "O death, where is thy sting?".
Did you go all that way in a DBX?!? How do you fuel scoop without stopping and waiting at every star you jump to?
I admire your patience I went from the Bubble to Sag A* in a Mamba, and that was a lot of jumps and a lot of fuel scooping. I prioritized the scoop higher than my FSD booster to be able to scoop while aligning the next star and charging the FSD as soon as it had cooled down. Didn't see a lot of planets on the way, and the way was still longer than swimming across the Atlantic OceanIt's a pretty easy trip from Colonia, as much as any trip is safe.I thought it was much further than it seemed.As for the fuel scooping,i have never really understood the issue.But that just makes my glass half full.Under the old ADS system,maybe, but my refuel time is hardly ever wasted time and a system devoid of planetary bodies is a stepping stone to somewhere else.
Beautiful, the exposure level in the trapezium core is excellent, hard to do. I tried for M42 on very still low water vapour nights on small telescopes.Some years ago, while doing astro photography, I got an idea about how to combine different images of the same object in the night sky into one image. This has a few interesting prospects. You can get a very high signal to noise ratio and since you average all the used images, you eliminate all the personal preferences people put into their particular version (one being too green is compensated by another being too red etc.). Last night, after having a ball at NGC 7822 in ED, I put together a quick version of the original nebula (combining ~100 different images), to see what it really looked like. The colors are not "natural", but this palette is often used, because it makes it easier to distinguish details in nebulae:
View attachment 143821
The "core" of NGC 7822.
NGC 7822 is basically a giant cloud of gas pulling itself together due to gravity. This causes the gas to clump in certain spots, leading to "even more gravity", finally causing birth of new stars. It is one of many stellar nurseries in the night sky, but it has been popularized somewhat by ED:
View attachment 143827
One of the most spectacular stellar nurseries is Messier 42 in the Orion constellation. You can see that with the naked eye even from a light polluted city, and it gets way better using a binocular in a dark place, but to really bring out the details, you have to take a picture with a VERY long exposure. I haven't calculated the total exposure time of this version, but it resembles keeping the shutter open for several years (this one is "natural" colors btw.):
View attachment 143831
Thanks for the link!Beautiful, the exposure level in the trapezium core is excellent, hard to do. I tried for M42 on very still low water vapour nights on small telescopes.
But mainly chase comets now...Shall I share my blog...um, yeah why not.. http://cometal-comets.blogspot.com/
fun stuff over the years.
Can someone explain the difference between honking a system and just letting the discovery scanner do it automatically?
As I understand it, the discovery scanner will automatically discover the stellar bodies in the system, and anything really close to the entry point (inside 60ls, maybe). But you have to honk to reveal all of the signal sources beyond that. In other words, if there's a gas giant out there at 3,000ls the passive scan will never reveal it.Can someone explain the difference between honking a system and just letting the discovery scanner do it automatically?
Can someone explain the difference between honking a system and just letting the discovery scanner do it automatically?
I thought they were the same thing ("honking" being the nickname given to manually firing off your discovery scanner), but I might misunderstand what you're asking.
As I understand it, the discovery scanner will automatically discover the stellar bodies in the system, and anything really close to the entry point (inside 60ls, maybe). But you have to honk to reveal all of the signal sources beyond that. In other words, if there's a gas giant out there at 3,000ls the passive scan will never reveal it.
2001c.Grinding a little for cash and explrer rank today. Not much progress. On the upside, in RL, we ordered a new car. Happy days.
Anyway, I was wondering... what is the maximum SC speed one can achieve? I've got to just over 200c but I was wondering, on a tip to, say, Hutton, how many times c does one get up to? Perhaps I should just do it and see
Grinding a little for cash and explorer rank today. Not much progress. On the upside, in RL, we ordered a new car. Happy days.
Anyway, I was wondering... what is the maximum SC speed one can achieve? I've got to just over 200c but I was wondering, on a trip to, say, Hutton, how many times c does one get up to? Perhaps I should just do it and see