Newcomer / Intro What are you up to?

Chris Simon

Chris Simon
KnezBP said:
The way I think of space flight in Elite if I were explaining it to a fellow Trekkie nerd is like:

1) Normal speed = Impulse engines
2) Supercruise = Warp 1 inter-system travel (First Contact)
3) Hyperspace = Warp 10 (Voyager episode I forget the name of)
Click to expand...
To be precise, in SC our ships can reach warp factor 7.3 (2001c) (and yes, it is a reference)
Hyperspace is more like a wormhole jump from Stargate or Event Horizon - almost instant traversal of any distance (limit being our FSD and how far ahead it can "target" a star)
 

KnezBP

KnezBP
Chris Simon said:
To be precise, in SC our ships can reach warp factor 7.3 (2001c) (and yes, it is a reference)
Hyperspace is more like a wormhole jump from Stargate or Event Horizon - almost instant traversal of any distance (limit being our FSD and how far ahead it can "target" a star)
Click to expand...
You think supercruise is the equivalent to warp 7.3? I trust your research but I'd have to go back and see where they were flying at warp 7 because that seems too fast for me.

Totally agree on the Stargate/Event Horizon thing though (SG-1 and and Event Horizon are aweome).
 

Chris Simon

Chris Simon
KnezBP said:
You think supercruise is the equivalent to warp 7.3? I trust your research but I'd have to go back and see where they were flying at warp 7 because that seems too fast for me.

Totally agree on the Stargate/Event Horizon thing though (SG-1 and and Event Horizon are aweome).
Click to expand...
The problem with this conversion is that our SC is continuous while warp factor is kind of "stepped".
But the max speed our ships can reach if you leave them accelerating for long enough is 2001c which, according to official Trekkie conversion is roughly Warp 7.3.
From the top of my head that's a speed at which you'd reach Alpha Centauri in about... 8 days roughly? Or is it 0.8 days. Are there any mathemagicians around?
 
Last edited:

KnezBP

KnezBP
Chris Simon said:
The problem with this conversion is that our SC is continuous while warp factor is kind of "stepped".
But the max speed our ships can reach if you leave them accelerating for long enough is 2001c which, according to official Trekkie conversion is roughly Warp 7.3.
From the top of my head that's a speed at which you'd reach Alpha Centauri in about... 8 days roughly? Or is it 0.8 days. Are there any mathemagicians around?
Click to expand...
Definitely not me. I deliberately got myself kicked out of B math so I could be with my dumb friends in C.

That's interesting though. Like I say, I trust your P.I. work. They do spend time chilling out a lot during warp in Star Trek, and even during hyperspace in Star Wars, so top warp is definitely not like MacGyvver jumping through a stargate a'la Elite.
 

Chris Simon

Chris Simon
KnezBP said:
Definitely not me. I deliberately got myself kicked out of B math so I could be with my dumb friends in C.

That's interesting though. Like I say, I trust your P.I. work. They do spend time chilling out a lot during warp in Star Trek, and even during hyperspace in Star Wars, so top warp is definitely not like MacGyvver jumping through a stargate a'la Elite.
Click to expand...
Yes, who can really say due to (understandable) cuts, but I think the travel between star systems in the order of weeks is what I kind of imagined when comes to Star Trek
 

Chris Simon

Chris Simon
KnezBP said:
I kinda had it in my head as days but it could be weeks.
Click to expand...
From a certain point of view, the fleet capital ships were generation ships (i.e. whole families lived on them, not just people serving the fleet) so I think it wouldn't be a stretch to expect traveling around the sectors to even take months and years.
But again, I'm not a trekkie (nor am I really a geek into any other kind of sci-fi, tbh. I just like them) I bet somebody studying this topic for the last 50 years would school us all in how the life on the Enterprise was.
 

KnezBP

KnezBP
Chris Simon said:
From a certain point of view, the fleet capital ships were generation ships (i.e. whole families lived on them, not just people serving the fleet) so I think it wouldn't be a stretch to expect traveling around the sectors to even take months and years.
But again, I'm not a trekkie (nor am I really a geek into any other kind of sci-fi, tbh. I just like them) I bet somebody studying this topic for the last 50 years would school us all in how the life on the Enterprise was.
Click to expand...
No, me neither. I asked a friend but he's probably doing something lame like playing GTA. I've only watched Star Trek religiously since Deep Space Nine so there's quite a few episodes I missed.
 

Tyres O'Flaherty

Tyres O'Flaherty
It appears someone who wrote system descriptions was a bit of a KLF fan:

cJmYJ3V.jpg
 

Deleted member 38366

D
My Carrier is at Day 10 of its long Exploration Campaign.

As expected, no sign of the primary Mission Objectives - a Green Gas Giant or a Notable Stellar Phenomena.
Many thousand Systems to go and the Arcadian Stream holds Billions of Stars, plenty of places left to go ;)

An Imperial Eagle discovering an Earth-Like world somewhere 17500LY out? No problem.
unknown.png


Some Biologicals were discovered, although nothing new for this Galactic Sector.
unknown.png


ELITE-Mercator-Anemones.jpg


The Mining Role Carrier Support Vessels can autonomously Scout and mine ad-hoc anywhere, which makes for a nice change of pacing....
unknown.png


unknown.png


Another Carrier Scout visiting an Ammonia World around a cool Dwarf...
ELITE-Mercator-Ammonia.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom