No widget HUD option for you current flight vector. You have to eyeball space dust.
At lol least lol he lol didn't lol saturate lol it lol with lols
Firstly, the worst in game storyline I've ever come across. Its totally dead.
There is as much personal engagement as a rock. It doesn't work for me.
And then, I found a game that does. Have a think about this. I like my ship a LOT. Whichever one I am piloting. Here's where FD screwed up. In assassins creed Black Flag, The ship works as it should in the water. As I am familiar with the sea, I let it do my work for me. Its not just a rubbish simulation of how water works, it actually does it extremely well.
I am way, way ahead of where I should be, because I understand this tactic, and the underlying physics of the game enable me to do so. Solid physics, solid gameplay. Surprise, surprise, you are ON a ship, travelling through a medium.
Which ED pathetically fails at.
1: There are no mediums in game.
2: Black hole my butt.
3: None at all. Its pathetic.
And I've just given up on all the bull.
There is a massive assumption that Black Holes exist here ! Nobody has seen one yet.
Even the so-called "gravity wave" detectors could have discovered something coming from inside the earth, not Black Holes somewhere out in in the beyond.
I really liked these on black holes and their general weirdness:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNaEBbFbvcY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx4562gesw0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KePNhUJ2reI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TZEp_n3eIc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcv_tYcRgw4
Firstly, the worst in game storyline I've ever come across. Its totally dead.
There is as much personal engagement as a rock. It doesn't work for me.
And then, I found a game that does. Have a think about this. I like my ship a LOT. Whichever one I am piloting. Here's where FD screwed up. In assassins creed Black Flag, The ship works as it should in the water. As I am familiar with the sea, I let it do my work for me. Its not just a rubbish simulation of how water works, it actually does it extremely well.
I am way, way ahead of where I should be, because I understand this tactic, and the underlying physics of the game enable me to do so. Solid physics, solid gameplay. Surprise, surprise, you are ON a ship, travelling through a medium.
Which ED pathetically fails at.
1: There are no mediums in game.
2: Black hole my butt.
3: None at all. Its pathetic.
And I've just given up on all the bull.
There is a massive assumption that Black Holes exist here ! Nobody has seen one yet.
Even the so-called "gravity wave" detectors could have discovered something coming from inside the earth, not Black Holes somewhere out in in the beyond.
Recent gravity wave detections are the best indirect evidence; a lot of effort was put into eliminating local sources of interference. But apart from that black holes are theoretical.
.
Recent gravity wave detections are the best indirect evidence; a lot of effort was put into eliminating local sources of interference. But apart from that black holes are theoretical.
...
It is said that fact is sometimes stranger than fiction, and nowhere is this more true than in the case of black holes. Black holes are stranger than anything dreamt up by science fiction writers, but they are firmly matters of science fact.
- Stephen Hawking
I thought gravity waves could also by explained by colliding pulsars and neutron stars? Out of curiosity, what else do you think could explain the orbits detected around SagA*?
Cheers
Yes, I haven't a clue!
Recent gravity wave detections are the best indirect evidence; a lot of effort was put into eliminating local sources of interference. But apart from that black holes are theoretical.
Being of a maths/science background, I've always been suspicious of black holes. In any other branch of science, if my equations fail with a "divide by zero" and produce "infinity" as an answer, I conclude that the equations aren't a good enough model of reality in the situation where I've applied them. But in cosmology, I instead seem to be allowed to conclude that I've discovered an unobserved astronomical object! I'll change my mind if gravity wave astronomy really takes off though.
I respect Stephen Hawking a lot, and he's much cleverer than I am. But I think he's more willing than me to believe raw mathematics. Like I said, in any other branch of science one doesn't readily accept equation singularities as representing what really happens. I'm not saying he's wrong, I just think black holes are still a bit speculative. Especially as the maths they come from (general relativity) is known to conflict with another highly successful theory (quantum mechanics). Those theories can't both be right as they stand, and we don't yet know which of them will have to be more modified to reconcile them.
Not sure what is more frightening, definitive proof that BH'S and SMBH's are out there, or that it is some other unknown phenomena that we are yet to understand. Either way, something is definitely at the heart of our galaxy and most other galaxy's we have observed, it doesn't emit light and it is capable of accelerating massive stars to great speeds.
Isn't a singularity delving into the Quantum world? Hence why we fully don't understand what goes on inside a blackhole. General relativity seems to be doing a good job right up to that point, and it perfectly explains everything we have observed so far. I tend to believe we have a hard time accepting an object with infinite mass, purely because we are at our infancy when it comes to Quantum mechanics.