What if we got something to do with the Thargoids that wasn't just killing them?

The Thargoids have a right to claim territory,
I don't recall any kind of interstellar law or signed treaty or whatever that could grant or recognize that right. :)

("Donkey, you HAVE the right to remain silent. What you lack, is the capacity.")

even if we speculate and say they are extra-galactic. Their claims are quite reasonable in size, there is absolutely no shortage of space.
If they are actually extra-galactic and there is no shortage of space, then laying claim to a territory that's basically our backyard is anything but reasonable.

I wonder what would they say about our right to claim a territory close to their homeworld.
 
I don't recall any kind of interstellar law or signed treaty or whatever that could grant or recognize that right. :)

("Donkey, you HAVE the right to remain silent. What you lack, is the capacity.")


If they are actually extra-galactic and there is no shortage of space, then laying claim to a territory that's basically our backyard is anything but reasonable.

I wonder what would they say about our right to claim a territory close to their homeworld.
I think at this point it's just a difference of opinion. Who put us in charge of granting rights to other species? Why is it their or anyone's fault that we popped up vaguely close (384LY, still outside the range of our natural bubble expansion even today) to the Pleiades? If our own actions are beyond criticism due to the lack of a treaty or whatever, then that would go both ways to put the Thargoids also beyond criticism.
 
goddammit...
I've only read the title and i was like: Wait! What? Isn't killing them not enough? So... torture?


i'll take my coat
 
Who put us in charge of granting rights to other species?
Who put them in charge of deciding who can lay claim to which territory?

I never said anyone put us in charge of anything. What I said was, that kind of right did not even exist. Whoever is capable of enforcing their claims with superior military strength will be in the position of ideologizing the moral aspects afterwards.

Why is it their or anyone's fault that we popped up vaguely close (384LY, still outside the range of our natural bubble expansion even today) to the Pleiades? If our own actions are beyond criticism due to the lack of a treaty or whatever, then that would go both ways to put the Thargoids also beyond criticism.
If we are talking about an extra-galactic species who came from millions of Lys away, then 384 Ly is not "vaguely close", it's a rounding error. Not to mention that they are even closer than that at the moment. Even after the destruction of one of their motherships, they still have 7 more Titans operating in human populated space. Maybe it's not the best time for "poor Thargoids have the right to occupy our territories" kind of speculation.

They don't seem to be very concerned about our rights either. They are busy trying to exterminate us.

War does not determine who is right, only who is left. :)
 
Last edited:
All of the justifications for attacking the Thargoids would equally justify an all-out total destruction attack on the Federation or Empire or Alliance etc.
No, no, you can't compare wars between humans to war with thargoids! Human vs human conflicts are really just friendly, neighbourly banter and practical jokes! It's totally different with thargoids, see, they are... are chitinous, and breath ammonia, and not like humans, they're alien, see—filthy xenos! This gives us the right to purge them, it's our God-Emperor given Holy Duty, you see!
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIpvoUQYU60
 
I don't recall any kind of interstellar law or signed treaty or whatever that could grant or recognize that right. :)

("Donkey, you HAVE the right to remain silent. What you lack, is the capacity.")


If they are actually extra-galactic and there is no shortage of space, then laying claim to a territory that's basically our backyard is anything but reasonable.

I wonder what would they say about our right to claim a territory close to their homeworld.
Prior usage, they were using that territory before our species evolved.
 
I'd say that was a gross over-exaggeration...
Now if the bubble & Colonia were being overrun with thousands of Titans or larger, killing all in their way, that would be extermination.
Currently they are just squabbling over nothing important to humans.
And we’re still treating it like it is an extreme existential threat that was ravaging its way through the Bubble, instead of just sticking to the core areas with an unknown, possibly unknowable (at the moment), purpose. Beyond what we were told by Seo about their intent to take territory and capture humans.

I feel like we’re just making things worse for ourselves and the Thargoids, as legitimate as defending our space may be…

And doing this to the Titans? To be quite honest, I’ve got a lot more to question about Aegis now than I did before if this is the kind of kill method they find acceptable.
 
I'd say that was a gross over-exaggeration...
Now if the bubble & Colonia were being overrun with thousands of Titans or larger, killing all in their way, that would be extermination.
That's just quantitative, not qualitative difference. It's not a very fast or particularly effective attempt of extermination, but still a nice try. :)

Currently they are just squabbling over nothing important to humans.
Totally agree, a couple dozens of systems destroyed, a couple million inhabitants killed, nothing important.
:)
 
Totally agree, a couple dozens of systems destroyed, a couple million inhabitants killed, nothing important.
PF members are killing more humans, overall, for profit... So a few million lost to Thargoids is barely scratching the surface, is it? (and one must assume that the wars in systems are killing humans too, and there is always war: War never changes..)
It's not a very fast or particularly effective attempt of extermination, but still a nice try. :)
I suppose it could be extermination if it went on for another 1,000 years or so...
By then the PF members would have razed everything to the ground anyway 🤷‍♂️ (providing it made a profit, or provided engineering materials, naturally)
 
What more can be done beyond killing them? Recycle them? Wait. Taxidermy?
There's already a game loop that involves interacting with Thargoids without killing them, with guides to build successful ships, with increasingly difficult levels.

Running away in one piece.

Ranging from easy Scouts to fiendish Scythes.
🤭
 
Who put them in charge of deciding who can lay claim to which territory?

I never said anyone put us in charge of anything. What I said was, that kind of right did not even exist. Whoever is capable of enforcing their claims with superior military strength will be in the position of ideologizing the moral aspects afterwards.


If we are talking about an extra-galactic species who came from millions of Lys away, then 384 Ly is not "vaguely close", it's a rounding error. Not to mention that they are even closer than that at the moment. Even after the destruction of one of their motherships, they still have 7 more Titans operating in human populated space. Maybe it's not the best time for "poor Thargoids have the right to occupy our territories" kind of speculation.

They don't seem to be very concerned about our rights either. They are busy trying to exterminate us.

War does not determine who is right, only who is left. :)
Okay, well, I think this is definitely a difference of opinion then. I don't think there's an argument that could be made when the two arguments are "which side is morally correct" and "morals aren't real". It's certainly a practical viewpoint but not what I'm arguing.
 
Who put them in charge of deciding who can lay claim to which territory?
Can't be certain because Humans weren't around several million years ago when Thargoids started using this region of space.

Using classic Humancentric thought process Humans showed up, took their stuff and started killing. Cmdrs were contracted to slaughter them. It became popular to gain Elite Combat rank doing so. This didn't happen in the Bubble of Human space, defending our homeworlds, but somewhere else that we travelled to. In an area we learned bit-by-bit was being utilized by another species. As we learned... not only did we continue our behavior, we escalated it.
 
Can't be certain because Humans weren't around several million years ago when Thargoids started using this region of space.

Using classic Humancentric thought process Humans showed up, took their stuff and started killing. Cmdrs were contracted to slaughter them. It became popular to gain Elite Combat rank doing so. This didn't happen in the Bubble of Human space, defending our homeworlds, but somewhere else that we travelled to. In an area we learned bit-by-bit was being utilized by another species. As we learned... not only did we continue our behavior, we escalated it.

yeap, we went all Predator on Thargs, hunting them for trophies.

edit: not to mention that we intentionally settled in areas known to be occupied by thargs, because it was better for the business to be closer to meta-alloys
 
Last edited:
By then the PF members would have razed everything to the ground anyway
You are just making things up. Name a single system that was destroyed by PF members.
If the number of systems you can name is smaller than the number of those that were razed by Thargoids, then PF members would clearly take more, not less, time to raze everything than Thargoids would. :)
Using classic Humancentric thought process
You seem to be very wise in the ways of Thargoid-centric thought process. :)
This didn't happen in the Bubble of Human space, defending our homeworlds, but somewhere else that we travelled to.
Yeah, somewhere else (very close to the Bubble) where the Thargoids also just travelled to, and they were not defending their homeworld either.

Okay, well, I think this is definitely a difference of opinion then. I don't think there's an argument that could be made when the two arguments are "which side is morally correct" and "morals aren't real". It's certainly a practical viewpoint but not what I'm arguing.
It's not saying 'morals aren't real', it's more like saying that only those who survive the conflict will have the luxury to think about morals. The side that goes extinct will not. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom