People aren't questioning whether you are having fun with the game regardless of the bugs, I can't understand why you continue to insist that is the case.
Yeah, it's weird isn't it?
People aren't questioning whether you are having fun with the game regardless of the bugs, I can't understand why you continue to insist that is the case.
I think it was very good of CIG to film the documentary of them failing to make the SQ42 demo. It turned out quite good considering. It was as if they knew they were going to fail. But that can't be right. Can it?
Weird would be using 92% of all your twitter posts in the past 3 years to comment on Star Citizen.
Thanks for the offer man, appreciate it.
What I would like to see is a video from start to finish without obvious interrupts showing you getting into the game, picking the mission and flying over. Whatever else you described (meeting other people, finding derelicts etc etc) is chance I get that but I would really love to see those constant 40 FPS or at least a video capture that would satisfy the use of "excellent". Anything else will be a bonus but seeing as you came across THREE derelicts and another abandoned ship in that single session expectations are high [/COLOR]Active chat is a must to prove that its indeed a multiplayer match
I d just like to repeat that I wouldnt want to see individual unconnected snippets of activities as you list them (ship blowing up SNIP going through an empty hull SNIP flying around) but an uninterrupted video stream from the moment you wake up in your cabin.
I am not very fond of screenshots. The right software and skillset can show pretty much anything as fact. The internet is full of fakes. At least when it comes to streamed videoplay the required resources to achieve the same result as in a screenshot are not available to the public and/or would cost a fortune. Nevertheless there are people out there watching these videos with a detectives eye (see past CiG trailers which have been dissected by attentive people).
As for the FPS counter, we know about 60 FPS in anything but the PU. No need about capturing old news. I d like to see proof of "excellent performance in the PU when other players are present". Thats all
Sounds good, will try to record something perhaps tonight. For the record too, I am a regular dude. Not a youtube streamer, recorder, etc... I do have a Twitch acct I originally set up to watch other streamers such as Capt Richard (hilarious dude playing both SC and ED). I tried streaming myself once to showcase a VAP I created for NMS; however it is no longer available as Twitch history is short lived. All in all though, I will try to do perhaps a 30/40 min uninterrupted stream following same scenario I did last night, to recreate as close as possible in the PU.
Also, is there overhead with streaming that may impact FPS? If so will likely need to factor that.
If this 'game' was any good, we would all be playing it.
This is the bit the zealots don't get.
So you are saying exactly what I said. Its possible that the player above didn't have those issues.
Thank you for clarifying.
- - - Updated - - -
I usually like GreyHeadedGamer's stuff.
https://www.youtube.com/user/grayheadedgamer
- - - Updated - - -
Chris Roberts clearly says "no promises". In clear English.
Do we know that they didn't have design documents for 3.0? (I honestly don't know).
My numbers are rather good estimates.
You can talk about anything you want, spend as much time doing it. Just don't expect not to get called out on it. That explains why LoD isn't finished yet, and is still quite the bug ridden mess it is.
How so? The game clearly isn't for everyone. Just like Elite. Or GTV. Or LoD.
It's hard to find, there was a little Q&A (in March, IIRC) from a guy responsible for cargo design, where he was explaining how it's going to work, and he said he was going to write a smuggling design document next. In this year, so after the claimed release date. As for the "no promises", saying that just after making a promise doesn't work.
How so? The game clearly isn't for everyone. Just like Elite. Or GTV. Or LoD.
My numbers are rather good estimates.
You can talk about anything you want, spend as much time doing it. Just don't expect not to get called out on it. That explains why LoD isn't finished yet, and is still quite the bug ridden mess it is.
How so? The game clearly isn't for everyone. Just like Elite. Or GTV. Or LoD.
This thread is FILLED with space nerds just in case you didnt notice. Whoever participates in this thread is either interested in SC or at least in the genre SC falls in. So basically this thread is FULL of potential backers and supporters. And if Star Citizen was indeed any good.....then yes WE ALL would play it. Did you really not get that? because if thats the case then I think we nailed down WHY we are unable to communicate here.
How so? The game clearly isn't for everyone. Just like Elite. Or GTV. Or LoD.
I don't even...
Dude, what does "If this 'game' was any good, we would all be playing it" have to do with "game clearly isn't for everyone"?
Gamers play games in genres they like. We're all space combat fans (doh!). Most of us backed Star Citizen. Most got a refund. Most are expressing their doubt & fury at being lied to and scammed into this train-wreck.
Which part are you missing exactly? We can help you with that.
How so? The game clearly isn't for everyone. Just like Elite. Or GTV. Or LoD.