Which wouldn't be effective at all on anyone who is paying attention to what is going on with the game.
The m50 is already available to buy in game for in game credits. If the Evocati stuff holds, the rest of the ships will be available in 3.6.
Ships available for in game purchase in 3.6 Evocati:
I wanted to talk about The Perils of Star Citizen’s Funding Model & Development It’s not my job to defend Star Citizen I do feel it gets a mix of both fair and unfair criticism tho. Because of it’s Development Style and Funding Model Currently I deem Star Citizen to be “Development as a Service” where the game is monetized towards funding it’s development with ship sales, quarterly releases, Roadmap updates and video updates so let’s talk about that as well with Development as a Service, My Problems of the Star Citizen Project.
They prey on the fear of missing out. Like if you don't buy, then that is it, you won't get one ever.
ships that basically you can't buy since long before you have grinded the money needed, they wipe everithing and you have to redo it all over again.
Just because something stupid is done by everyone doesn't mean it's less nonsense
Are you suggesting CIG deserves the benefit of the doubt?But then I would like Agony to publicly denounce the horrible and terrible practice of saying "don't miss out!" when others do it too. Like Frontier Developments. Otherwise you're simply selective at best, and a complete hypocrite at worst.
Which is a common thing here: the SC fanboys praise stuff that is common elsewhere, and the salty bois bash CIG for things they would otherwise never bring up if it concerned other companies.
Are
Are you suggesting CIG deserves the benefit of the doubt?
There’s a long list of dodgy practices you’ve decided to overlook.
Or are you just doubling down on your defensiveness because you’re deeply invested?
Oh come on, saying 'dont miss out!' is as generic a phrase when selling anything as it gets. This is really a textbook example of going out of your way to complain about something because you already made your mind up.
But then I would like Agony to publicly denounce the horrible and terrible practice of saying "don't miss out!" when others do it too. Like Frontier Developments. Otherwise you're simply selective at best, and a complete hypocrite at worst.
Sure CIG are the very definition of fair play and value for money.Lol, none of the above. But that is also another charming element: god forbid you don't spend every single word you ever type here bashing cig or you are 'one of them'.
But to answer your weirdly phrased question: all I am saying is "don't be a hypocrite. Even when it serves to bash CIG more."
Yes, a very controversial statement, I know.
My dear Mole, you'll notice the post in question wasn't directly attacking Star Citizen as well, which is tantamount to being a top tier backer with all the trimmings around these parts.
I'm fairly sure I'm only a few posts away from Agony Aunt offering to meet me in a car park below a wrestling event for a sword fight to determine which of the two projects is the one.
How about a game of tic tac toe?
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/c5ddfl/boredgamer_development_as_a_service_my_problems/
The above linked post is odd to read. I submitted Bored's latest video to /r/StarCitizen to gather more discussion on the topic, yet all the comments are focused on BoredGamer himself, driven by a bunch of ad-hominems at him. A surprise to be sure, but not a welcome one.
I'm sure it will have an epic sound track at least.I'm fairly sure I'm only a few posts away from Agony Aunt offering to meet me in a car park below a wrestling event for a sword fight to determine which of the two projects is the one.