It'll be 50 im a short while
Please reconsider fleet carriers for solo players.
- Thread starter CMDR Karrde Sun
- Start date
- Status
You're consistently positively inclined towards ED. Nothing wrong. You're also mostly reasonable about it, imo.
That isn't being a white knight. A white knight will defend somebody/thing even when its indefensible. I don't believe I have ever done that.
Thanks.
Max certainly isn't a hater. I think the problem is that we often look at isolated discussions.
When I read your rants about engineering I often think that you must hate the game, but when I read your posts on a different topic it's like you are the most reasonable person in the world...
Flatterer.Max certainly isn't a hater. I think the problem is that we often look at isolated discussions.
When I read your rants about engineering I often think that you must hate the game, but when I read your posts on a different topic it's like you are the most reasonable person in the world...
There are parts of the game that I don't like though. But mostly I really like it, if I didn't I wouldnt still be playing it.Max certainly isn't a hater. I think the problem is that we often look at isolated discussions.
When I read your rants about engineering I often think that you must hate the game, but when I read your posts on a different topic it's like you are the most reasonable person in the world...
But that’s E
in general.I guess this would mean you’re grinding to operate your carrier rather than grinding for no reason...
But that’s E
I guess this would mean you’re grinding to operate your carrier rather than grinding for no reason...
Yeah as a solo cmdr I would love to pack up all my ships and do an engineering run where I can just park in orbit around the engineers and get them all done one after another
They told me that fifty was just a number- that was the start of a decade of woe...
There is a U-toob post which has 100 in an instance. - that might have been a special event tho, - can't remember.
I have just 5, large capacity, medium capacity, a warship, medium range, and long range Exploration ships
I disagree.
Does everyone just ignore the facts?
If the carriers are squadron based, you only get to take one ship.
I guess you could always get a dozen accounts then have all 12 join your squadron.
If the carriers are squadron based, you only get to take one ship.
I guess you could always get a dozen accounts then have all 12 join your squadron.
bah, why couldn't i just hire pilots. also,
+1 for solo carriers. Freighters are indespensible in No Man's Sky, for eample. Being able to call freighters into orbit would also be nice.
Introverts don't squadron up, so it'd be sad if we missed out too.
Code:
US$0.02++Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
Free on consoles and relatively inexpensive on PC in the sales.
Just wait until you can earn them with Arx points.
![[Diplomacy] Carnegie](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/123/123809.jpg?1553527149){kind=avatar}
Yeah, but if one ship per commander then you have to 'level up' all your commanders.
Want a T9 tanker for refueling? Gotta grind void opals on that account to pay for it.
Want an Eagle canyon racer? Have fun unlocking engineers on that account to get your G5 drag drives.
Every ship you want is another alt to grind.
Sure, you can do it, but to me it seems like an awful lot of effort to go to, compared to ship transfer.
No point in speculating, really. But, my opinion is that if fleet carriers are going to be a massive drain on entire squadrons. Then why would a solo player ever want that? I doubt that even despite their best efforts fleet carriers will simply be out of reach.
Because lets be honest. We all know these things are going to be both credit and material sinks.
Because lets be honest. We all know these things are going to be both credit and material sinks.
Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
For me, that's the whole point of buying an altCMDR, to start from scratch and enjoy the early game again.
There'll be a second reason if a Squadron membership threshold is put in place for Carrier ownership.
- Status