I'll correct myself and call it 'the last known planned implementation' OK?
Please reconsider fleet carriers for solo players.
- Thread starter CMDR Karrde Sun
- Start date
- Status
Of course we don't. But its the only thing we have to go on at the moment.
Too late!!!No need to, just wanted to mention it.
Managing expectations and all that.
Pretty much what I have been trying to doManaging expectations and all that.
I don't think its based around PvP, much like most of the game.
You mean the little children who ended up playing ED and asking for stuff not intended for them?
Then want it within the mechanics or rules of the game. Or find an exploit.
If a carrier can't be owned by a lone wolf, get around it. Go find some friends and, God Forbid... form a squadron.
Or use your alts to form one just to fulfill the requirements.
Sandbox.
Nobody knows what will be implemented, and no one can change what Frontier has already written in stone- and are not telling.
Too late!!!
Yeah seems that way. Max Factor is just being max (and bless again for getting us to 50 pages), but the rest of the white knights have been unusually quiet.. maybe they might want a go too.
Thank goodness.
I've said it, I don't know how many times, I don't have anything against PvP. I get that this is the only reason some people can get on with their lives. I'm just not one of them. It's fun for like 1 or 2 rounds, and then it's old and boring, and well, Elite, for a much time and effort has gone into it, really isn't much of a combat simulator. It's great for simulating a galaxy. Acceptable for simulating flying a ship around. Reasonable decent at simulating galactic trade, and that's really it. It's a Multi-Role Game - absolutely perfect at being perfectly alright at everything, and not spectacular at anything.
What makes me a white knight. Do you even know what that means?
As soon as you descend to name calling you already diminish your argument especially when it is blatantly not true.
There is plenty I am not happy about in the game.
Last edited:
If you have a license you could drive a motorhome and tow your compact behind it?
Someones coming off as a little child all right.
Im not arguing anything, perhaps only in response to you naysaying. The point was to provide feedback to frontier.
Chivalrous individuals are people too, and of course welcome. They just have a mantle of a certain uniform color and a particular persuasion in discussion.
That is correct. However you would need that license first.
Just like you would need a squadron to own a fleet carrier.
It's kinda a little inconvenient detail. But it's there nonetheless.
Yeah. Someones ... with the s. So many of them here asking or stuff that were not meant for them.
Why?
You haven't answered the question. How am I a white knight? What have I been doing that is "white knightish".
No, not really. It just happens to be the assumption that fits best to a narrow mind.
It's easy to assume everyone who disagrees with you on certain topics must be a white knight, because that way you can just dismiss their opinions rather than accepting how different people have different ideas.
For some people the simple fact that they don't have a monopoly on truth is so bad that they need to create an alternate reality where such things as opinions do not exist.
- Status