The Quest To Find Raxxla

Jermainwelch

Jermainwelch
Cunder said:
Has anyone brought up or suggest that the Raxxla toast maybe not the direction of Raxxla but rather the artefact Omphalos Rift?
Click to expand...
It’s possible. Tbh tho WHAT the Toast refers to is fun tinfoil. But the Toast has to lead anywhere first before we can reliably discuss that right. The Toast is def a set of directions to something atleast.
 

alexzk

A
Mapped a bit equal remote to those:
C++: 
const static Point A{-3183.53125, 73.59375, 8595.65625}; //Pru Aescs NC-M d7-192 (coflux delta mission 4/4 "Gravity." -> it is the Mother of Galaxies)
const static Point C{-5805.78125, 129.875, -5969.875}; //    Eafots EU-R c4-1 (fr alpha)
const static Point Zurara{-9529.4375, -64.5, -7428.4375}; //Syreadiae JX-F c0
const static auto &B = Zurara;

Nothing too much there >: Darn.
 

Attachments

  • inf_line.txt
    6.1 KB · Views: 246

Emperor

Emperor
Jermainwelch said:
I know the Landscape Signal has been researched intensely, but do we have any ideas what the two “A” ‘s allude too? Kind of strange. My first thought was that it was for Sag. A but considering the signal hasn’t been moved and no bug report as of yet has confirmed it’s existence or location as a bug we have to think it intentional right? Maybe it’s a signature for an Audio designer in FDev? Like a little Easter egg. Or is the A meant to lead us somewhere.

The only region name with two words both starting with A is Achiles Altar. But région names were added later after the LS signal, which was present in the vanilla game afaik.

Plus other questions that arise, what is creating the signal? As of rn unknown as you can’t fly at the signal from any nearby systems. And who is this signal for? If this is a man made signal, or alien signal, what is it’s functional purpose by it’s creator. (If it even has one, if it’s a natural phenomenon than it’s much older)

And I mean following the route that the “A”’s could be a message or signature. One character’s name starting with an A is Alex Ryder.

Ps: just watched MATTIUS ‘s video, awesome work, got me thinking about the LS again from a different angle so good work mate : )
Click to expand...

It's quite obviously illustrating how dark matter annihilations and astrophysical sources could combine to make up the observed residual emission surrounding the Galactic Center.

You can see the Galactic Ridge emission has been extrapolated from the higher energy spectrum, assuming a pion decay origin and a power-law proton spectrum..

Simples :)

 

Vetinari

V
Emperor said:
It's quite obviously illustrating

You can see the Galactic

Simples :)

Click to expand...

These are all the words I understood from your post :) Im simples not the solution lol

alexzk said:
. I.e. somebody was there but didn't even scan all main stars in system. And worse thing I already been there 150ly away :D
Click to expand...

Usually means someone had the old discovery scanner and nobody been through with a new DS or since the Explo update....apart from honk n scoopers maybe
 

Thatchinho

Thatchinho
Same comment from me as always on the signals in the skybox.

I’m sure I heard a long long time ago that they are a simulation of RL radio sources.

Again, I don’t have a source for it, and it was so long ago that, despite generally having a good memory for this stuff and being able to track things down, where I heard it eludes me. Pretty sure I heard it via other players though, not direct from FD.

The story has always checked out though, given that there are indeed RL radio sources that aren’t tied to specific objects.

Of course, (and for the avoidance of doubt) if that is all true, it doesn’t mean that FD haven’t also done something more with it.

In fact, it’s generally worth bearing in mind that any current* RL mystery or astronomical phenomena of note should (in principle) have been looked at further within the ED universe a long time ago.

On the other hand of course, FD may also have just put placeholders for things in case of something being found in the near future, and/or as nods to or Easter eggs for RL stuff...


*with ‘current’ in this context generally having an effective and specific meaning of being anything that was current at the game’s release date.
 
Last edited:

Thatchinho

Thatchinho
alexzk said:
I started to play 16 months ago about. So that sound "always was so" for me, still can't hear any mystery there. Maybe you do, just because it is "new" for you.
Click to expand...
Was that a reply to anyone in particular?

I’m just asking as it was shortly after my post, and it uses the word ‘mystery’ which I also did in my post, but I didn’t notice being used in the preceding posts.

Anyway, if it was in reply to mine then something has been misunderstood, and I’ll explain.

If it wasn’t then all’s good, and presumably no additional explanation or clarification from me is needed!
 

alexzk

A
Thatchinho said:
Was that a reply to anyone in particular?

I’m just asking as it was shortly after my post, and it uses the word ‘mystery’ which I also did in my post, but I didn’t notice being used in the preceding posts.

Anyway, if it was in reply to mine then something has been misunderstood, and I’ll explain.

If it wasn’t then all’s good, and presumably no additional explanation or clarification from me is needed!
Click to expand...
Nvm. Just said in general about sound everybody talk. It just does not sound anyhow special for me...
 

Thatchinho

Thatchinho
alexzk said:
Nvm. Just said in general about sound everybody talk. It just does not sound anyhow special for me...
Click to expand...
Cool. I thought you were probably just saying it in general. But as it could have been a reply to mine, I thought I’d check just in case. All good!

FWIW, I think it’s good that people are looking into it again. 2 reasons:

A. It’s an interesting thing for people to look into in its own right (assuming that it’s of interest to the people doing so, of course!)

B. There’s the possibility that FD have made more of it than the explanation I’m aware of

I just hope that people looking into it will see A as a completely full and worthwhile thing on its own and they won’t feel disenfranchised if the explanation I’m aware of turns out to be correct and all there is to it.

(In the absence of any actual citation, the explanation I’m aware of could actually be completely wrong, of course!)

Edit - btw, on the topic of people looking into things being good, best of luck with your current investigation as well! 👍
 

Han_Zen

Han_Zen
I'm currently out and about in 34 P Cygni: https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/6097757/name/34+P+Cygni

Why?
I think it's clear that Astrophel in the poem Astrophel and Stella, refers to the author Phillip Sidney. Sidney was know as the Swan, due to the similarity of the words Sidney and cygne. In a eulogy by Edmund Spenser, he is described as a swan that dies and rises to the heavens to become a star sign.

P = Philip and perhaps Princess
Cygni = Sidney = Astrophel

I was also hoping for 34 dots in the Raxxla symbol, but it seems most likely to be 33(unless we count the dot in the middle). 😒

P Cygni brightened considerably in the year 1600 (shortly after Sidney's death) and was a considered a possible Nova, by Kepler and other astronomers.
Kepler%20new%20star.jpg

The system has 'spiralling stars'. 4 Y class dwarfs. 3 with large rings and one with a planet. The planet is not landable, but has two rings it self.

The system is also a decent 'Gate to Elysium', as it's right on the border to the Elysian fields region.

I haven't found anything mysterious in the system, but there is plenty of places to hide something in the rings.

I do have a question though. I peaked at my Journal log file and spotted that the system body IDs are a bit odd.

They are:
BodyID 0: 34 P Cygni
BodyID 1: 34 P Cygni 1
BodyID 2: 34 P Cygni 1 A ring
BodyID 3: 34 P Cygni 2
BodyID 4: 34 P Cygni 2 A ring
BodyID 5: 34 P Cygni 3
BodyID 6: 34 P Cygni 3 A ring
BodyID 9: Null (Center for 4 and 5 pair)
BodyID 10: 34 P Cygni 4
BodyID 11: 34 P Cygni 5
BodyID 12: 34 P Cygni 5 A ring
BodyID 13: 34 P Cygni 5 B ring

7 and 8 are missing. I wonder if this is normal or if it is a sign of something hidden?
 

Thatchinho

Thatchinho
Han_Zen said:
I'm currently out and about in 34 P Cygni: https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/6097757/name/34+P+Cygni

Why?
I think it's clear that Astrophel in the poem Astrophel and Stella, refers to the author Phillip Sidney. Sidney was know as the Swan, due to the similarity of the words Sidney and cygne. In a eulogy by Edmund Spenser, he is described as a swan that dies and rises to the heavens to become a star sign.

P = Philip and perhaps Princess
Cygni = Sidney = Astrophel

I was also hoping for 34 dots in the Raxxla symbol, but it seems most likely to be 33(unless we count the dot in the middle). 😒

P Cygni brightened considerably in the year 1600 (shortly after Sidney's death) and was a considered a possible Nova, by Kepler and other astronomers.
Kepler%20new%20star.jpg

The system has 'spiralling stars'. 4 Y class dwarfs. 3 with large rings and one with a planet. The planet is not landable, but has two rings it self.

The system is also a decent 'Gate to Elysium', as it's right on the border to the Elysian fields region.

I haven't found anything mysterious in the system, but there is plenty of places to hide something in the rings.

I do have a question though. I peaked at my Journal log file and spotted that the system body IDs are a bit odd.

They are:
BodyID 0: 34 P Cygni
BodyID 1: 34 P Cygni 1
BodyID 2: 34 P Cygni 1 A ring
BodyID 3: 34 P Cygni 2
BodyID 4: 34 P Cygni 2 A ring
BodyID 5: 34 P Cygni 3
BodyID 6: 34 P Cygni 3 A ring
BodyID 9: Null (Center for 4 and 5 pair)
BodyID 10: 34 P Cygni 4
BodyID 11: 34 P Cygni 5
BodyID 12: 34 P Cygni 5 A ring
BodyID 13: 34 P Cygni 5 B ring

7 and 8 are missing. I wonder if this is normal or if it is a sign of something hidden?
Click to expand...
Hmm. Not sure. No unscanned rings or asteroid clusters or anything like that?

Assuming not, and no one already has a definitive answer, first thing I’d suggest is for Pareco to be visited and scanned and logs compared to see whether comets are reflected in the logs.

A comparison with Sol would be good too, due to rumours of Haley’s comet having been implemented.

Can’t do either of those myself, so it’s one for anyone who’s in the vicinity and is happy to check.

Edit - Also, nice work! 👍
 

Vetinari

V
Han_Zen said:
7 and 8 are missing. I wonder if this is normal or if it is a sign of something hidden?
Click to expand...

Tinfoil.

A COVAS purchase is available that has either Norman Lovett or a soundalike, sounds exactly like a HOLographic computer from another sci fi series, Red dwarf.

In Red Dwarf during one particularly important moment involving complex equations, during the countdown HOL skipped the number 7 and then said something like '7, Ive always had a blind spot with 7s'

Conclusion:

HOL is not just COVAS but actually running the software!

On a side note I am working on a much longer disconnected tinfoil saga involving retcons that may well be my magnum opus of tinfoilery, hows everyone else doing?
 

Han_Zen

Han_Zen
Thatchinho said:
Hmm. Not sure. No unscanned rings or asteroid clusters or anything like that?

Assuming not, and no one already has a definitive answer, first thing I’d suggest is for Pareco to be visited and scanned and logs compared to see whether comets are reflected in the logs.

A comparison with Sol would be good too, due to rumours of Haley’s comet having been implemented.

Can’t do either of those myself, so it’s one for anyone who’s in the vicinity and is happy to check.

Edit - Also, nice work! 👍
Click to expand...
There is nothing that is unscanned in the system. I was lucky that all the sub stars have rings in their branch. If not, I wouldn't have been able to probe them.
The result comes out like this: "ScanType":"Detailed", "BodyName":"34 P Cygni 5 B Ring", "BodyID":13, "Parents":[ {"Planet":11}, {"Null":9}, {"Star":0} ], "StarSystem":"34 P Cygni"

It's a nice system for mining, if you bring an FC. Lots of expensive material hot spots. I don't even have a mining laser. 🤷‍♂️
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom