A Demo is a trail of the final game. An alpha is a testing mechanic for an incomplete game. Feel free to educate yourself here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle
You could re-label it a chicken-cheese sandwich,
Neither are reasons you should be allowed access to test something you refused to pay for.
My issue is that my decision to go Premium Beta not Alpha was based on the information at the time that Alpha would be 1 month. Had I known then that actually it would be six months or more then probably I would have made a different decision. I also bought a new rig in preparation for Premium Beta which again could have been deferred.
LOL if we were still waiting for Alpha 1, I wonder how many of those backers would still be thumbing noses at lowly beta-backers. How many of you would honestly be saying "hey, FD, take your sweet time and don't bother updating any release schedule that you used to get us to buy into this project because we all know those are just bogus anyway"?
No, if FD were still neither releasing Alpha nor updating project schedules , hypocrites would be bleating even louder than Beta-backers who have been very patient with FD.
And to anyone who's saying not to release Beta too early, there's a difference between asking for something early and asking for a reasonable update on status. If I'm in a restaurant waiting for food, I don't want it undercooked. But that's very different to wanting a reasonable idea of the cook's expectation of when I could expect it.
so, you would be okay if they would just re-label the alpha1 offline scenarios chicken cheese sandwich and hand that out to every backer account? I could live with that too.
You paid for 1 month alpha access. You´ll get 5-6 months instead, and I get nothing, although my delivery date has passed?
I´m sure you have an obvious explanation how that is the definition of fairness.
LOL if we were still waiting for Alpha 1, I wonder how many of those backers would still be thumbing noses at lowly beta-backers. How many of you would honestly be saying "hey, FD, take your sweet time and don't bother updating any release schedule that you used to get us to buy into this project because we all know those are just bogus anyway"?
No, if FD were still neither releasing Alpha nor updating project schedules , hypocrites would be bleating even louder than Beta-backers who have been very patient with FD.
And to anyone who's saying not to release Beta too early, there's a difference between asking for something early and asking for a reasonable update on status. If I'm in a restaurant waiting for food, I don't want it undercooked. But that's very different to wanting a reasonable idea of the cook's expectation of when I could expect it.
Hey, many alpha backers are just as annoyed at the delay as the Beta backers.
IMO the reason they get a hot poker up the rear-end about KS schedule is because of their persistent failure to be open and honest about a schedule. After all, they are arguably in breach of the spirit of KS terms.
It's great that some enthusiasts are willing to share with everyone in this forum the current state of Alpha on a regular basis. It's also entirely understandable that delays happen due to unforeseen circumstances.
But for FD to completely ignore so many of the paying customer-base, many of whom have had the goodwill to fork out more than 3x the normal price of a retail product, is inexcusable.
To be honest I doubt Alpha backers are as annoyed (frustrated would be a better word) as The Beta crowd as Alpha backers have something tangible to play around with / test regardless of content ... we can swap accounts if you like![]()
As for stress testing, isn't that typically what Gamma is for?
Possibly. I think that if the whole process was delayed, rather than just the beta I think everyone would have accepted it as another slipped milestone. The Alpha taking this long looks like the alpha backers are getting preferential treatment when what's actually happening is that the game is just taking longer.
Not really, I believe that the Gamma phase idea has pretty much been invented for E: D .. usually things like stress testing would be done during the Beta phase ... but I could be wrong![]()
Oh, don't get me wrong .. I have no thoughts or believe that the Alpha peep's are getting preferential treatment ... far from it .. the process is taking as long as it takes .. I am just saying I fully understand the frustrations of the Beta backers having to wait so long .. by no means do I think I am being treated unfairly .... I just want my bleedin' Beta![]()
Possibly. I think that if the whole process was delayed, rather than just the beta I think everyone would have accepted it as another slipped milestone. The Alpha taking this long looks like the alpha backers are getting preferential treatment when what's actually happening is that the game is just taking longer.
IF i had access to the alpha would I ruin the experience of the full game by hammering the alpha too much...... And the answer is yes probably.
If the game is not finished it isnt finished, but patience will benifit in the long run.....
Not really, I believe that the Gamma phase idea has pretty much been invented for E: D .. usually things like stress testing would be done during the Beta phase ... but I could be wrong![]()
If I wouldn't want to Alpha/Beta test a game, I wouldn't pledge for the Alpha or Beta version.
And for me this isn't really about patience - it is about the fact that I invested a large sum of money into the project based on the premise that I would be taking part into testing an early version of the game sometime around January, and it is now April.
It happens unfortunately.I'm not sure I've seen any alpha backers rubbing the alpha in beta backers faces.