Aye I get it, if Frontier produce something substandard it's the forum's fault. Makes sense.
LOL, this made my day.
Aye I get it, if Frontier produce something substandard it's the forum's fault. Makes sense.
Considering it's a trait of the hull and not just another normal mod there is every reason. Also the Krait isn't a python with an SLF either. The Krait is a ship I prefer to the python in ways that don't even involve the SLF. Not to mention a lack of strategic options in hulls. Trade a C6 + another (or one of the 5's) for the SLF or gain 2 slots and lose the fighter, some maneuvering responsiveness and jumprange.Yep, there's no reason why similarly sized ships can't carry SLFs as well.
I see, he was being sarcastic.. I agree, they do perform differently while using the same class internals. They are completely different hulls for crying out loud.. Try boost spamming in both ships with the same distributor and watch the difference. Claiming the Krait is the same as the Python is plain stupid. They share some similarities, but that's it.
"We"? Who is "we"? How about you only speak for yourself.We didn't chose this.
Ie: Is adding more and more and more weapons making combat more engaging? Surely at some point , after X years, some more engaging combat scenarios and gameplay might be beneficial?
I've flown both ships, and have my own opinion on them.Please note the similarities:
"We"? Who is "we"? How about you only speak for yourself.
Pretty much this when it comes to KvP.I've flown both ships, and have my own opinion on them.
Collectively there has been plenty of people expressing desire for an Alliance SLF ship. Pretty much everyone who complains about the Challenger not having one is asking for the Crusader.I never got the memo that the community got together and asked for three similar alliance ships.
Considering it's a trait of the hull and not just another normal mod there is every reason. Also the Krait isn't a python with an SLF either. The Krait is a ship I prefer to the python in ways that don't even involve the SLF. Not to mention a lack of strategic options in hulls. Trade a C6 + another (or one of the 5's) for the SLF or gain 2 slots and lose the fighter, some maneuvering responsiveness and jumprange.
Since when does "the community" get to dictate what should or shouldn't be developed? Should we have a, let's call it, "Council of Stellar Failures", which Fdev is required to ask permission first before they invest into Elite?I never got the memo that the community got together and asked for three similar alliance ships.
Collectively there has been plenty of people expressing desire for an Alliance SLF ship. Pretty much everyone who complains about the Challenger not having one is asking for the Crusader.
Since when does "the community" get to dictate what should or shouldn't be developed? Should we have a, let's call it, "Council of Stellar Failures", which Fdev is required to ask permission first before they invest into Elite?
Ah. Great. Flushed. Done. I'll wash my hands now.No they don't, that's why I wrote what I wrote.
False, they did have the SLF bay designed on them prior to SLFs being in game. As such we knew which ships would get them prior to implementation.Such trait is arbitrary as ships didn't have such opening before SLFs were implemented or in other words, FD choose which ones would have such trait and their reasons to disallow some ships to not have them remain unknown.
False, they did have the SLF bay designed on them prior to SLFs being in game. As such we knew which ships would get them prior to implementation.
http://elite-dangerous.wikia.com/wiki/KeelbackSources please.
http://elite-dangerous.wikia.com/wiki/Keelback
The description of the Keelback mentioned SLFs before they were implemented.
The Keelback was introduced in 1.5, SLFs in 2.2
https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/3sujxx/pics_of_all_known_fighter_bays_ed_15/Sources please.
Then watch a video from when the ship was introduced.. I don't need to do all the googling for you, do I?That still doesn't prove that the description didn't change over the course of time.
https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/3sujxx/pics_of_all_known_fighter_bays_ed_15/
That's from Nov, 2015. 2.2 didn't drop adding fighters until Oct, 2016.
Then watch a video from when the ship was introduced.. I don't need to do all the googling for you, do I?
I see, he was being sarcastic.. I agree, they do perform differently while using the same class internals. They are completely different hulls for crying out loud.. Try boost spamming in both ships with the same distributor and watch the difference. Claiming the Krait is the same as the Python is plain stupid. They share some similarities, but that's it.