Yep, terrible, nobody wants them...terrible systems; Brown dwarfs with some dead ice balls in the darkness
Which is great for me, thanks.
Yep, terrible, nobody wants them...terrible systems; Brown dwarfs with some dead ice balls in the darkness
We have several "it's not FOR you" threads..."get thrown in jail for saying that, these days...", etc etc
I think they are, and that's why our own list of required cargo is so small next to the mass of the completed structuresI think it's time for all the NPC that are stopping at the construction skiff to start contributing. IMHO.
You seem to fail to understand the enormity of the galaxy. Even if we colonized 1 system per second it would take well over anyone's lifetime to get them all.So much for people showing up late to the party. I guess there is no FDEV interest in leaving something for newer players. Not that I am. I'm just an off and on player that was busy elsewhere and dindn't think the BETA would be used to colonize the entire bubble out to guardian sites.
I've not had any trouble loading up Steel+Titanium+Aluminium+CMM locally.Has anyone else notice resources are scarce in the universe now. Inara.cz is wrong on just about all acounts for steel and other commodities used to build stations. Even hours old data is incorrect now.
I think it's time for all the NPC that are stopping at the construction skiff to start contributing. IMHO.
There is another option, which is to buy up Haematite - huge quantities available everywhere - and take that across to a Refinery station (or an Odyssey Industrial settlement) to convert it into Steel at 2:1. Needs somewhat specific circumstances to be efficient but if you're really having trouble finding Steel, making your own might be quicker.
I did this for all commodities until I was a 0 requirement. I'm 92% done and gathering the last few resources has me running all over the galaxy.I've not had any trouble loading up Steel+Titanium+Aluminium+CMM locally.
(If I was focusing solely on one, then yes, but combining the four and hopping around the few closest refinery ports tends to work okay)
In my mind this means anyone that builds a ORBIS station will have to coordinate their efforts by timing visits as I think require 40000 steel. They should honestly give longer time to build bigger stations. Like 2 to 3 months.Still, this is certainly a situation where Inara is likely to be inaccurate at times, yes.
- a million-population Refinery might stock around 30,000 tonnes of Steel when full
- which means it regenerates very roughly around 500t of Steel an hour (lots of station-specific factors involved here)
- which means a single T-9 visiting an hour to buy Steel makes it empty faster than it fills
- and if it's on Inara with a high stock level and is in a convenient location, it'll probably be getting that
"Hours old" is plenty of time for it to be emptied by someone not updating Inara themselves
You'll probably find that it gets a little easier now that the weekend is over - weekends tend to be about 50% higher traffic than weekdays, so that's 50% more cargo use too, which can certainly make the difference between "gradually increasing supply" and "gradually decreasing supply".
Then placing an Orbis becomes a handy extended 'placeholder'. Why limit your hold to 3 weeks when you can make it 3 months?I did this for all commodities until I was a 0 requirement. I'm 92% done and gathering the last few resources has me running all over the galaxy.
In my mind this means anyone that builds a ORBIS station will have to coordinate their efforts by timing visits as I think require 40000 steel. They should honestly give longer time to build bigger stations. Like 2 to 3 months.
Build your bigger station after the initial one.I did this for all commodities until I was a 0 requirement. I'm 92% done and gathering the last few resources has me running all over the galaxy.
In my mind this means anyone that builds a ORBIS station will have to coordinate their efforts by timing visits as I think require 40000 steel. They should honestly give longer time to build bigger stations. Like 2 to 3 months.
Especially those bloody Type-9s!!!Lol. Exactly what I was thinking as I watched several NPC ships land then take off from my planetary construction site![]()
No. I mean, Yes! Also.I did this for all commodities until I was a 0 requirement. I'm 92% done and gathering the last few resources has me running all over the galaxy.
In my mind this means anyone that builds a ORBIS station will have to coordinate their efforts by timing visits as I think require 40000 steel. They should honestly give longer time to build bigger stations. Like 2 to 3 months.
I would love for the factions to start offering cargo rewards that worked for building. Then at the least there would be some other gameplay that contributed to the effort beyond just point-A to B hauling.Lol. Exactly what I was thinking as I watched several NPC ships land then take off from my planetary construction site![]()
There is this much available from an Inara search less than a minute ago.Is there a way to make Insulating Membranes. Not enough supply of these in the galaxy. from the looks of it I'm going to have to stop at 300 stations or travel 1000 LY to get enough. Bruh.....
Some people when they first start to read a thread reply to things as they read through from the first post to the current one, I do it myself but often have to edit my post out of embarrassment later.I really wish peeps would not respond to old quotes of quotes or outdated information. I'm over my initial angst and now I'm knee deep in hauling limited resources around the galaxy.
You are likely to hit depleted stations if you use Inara like that, as it tends to funnel the players to the same locations, which depletes them. Use the in-game tools instead to find your own supply, or use Inara to find suitable installations rather than using it to search for commodities.Has anyone else notice resources are scarce in the universe now. Inara.cz is wrong on just about all acounts for steel and other commodities used to build stations. Even hours old data is incorrect now.