I just spent the last two hours scaling a mountain on foot.Look at this! The panetary tech is truly broken beyond repair!
![]()
Everything is flat! There are no mountains!
![]()
How scandalous!
Or so are people saying....
I just spent the last two hours scaling a mountain on foot.Look at this! The panetary tech is truly broken beyond repair!
![]()
Everything is flat! There are no mountains!
![]()
How scandalous!
Or so are people saying....
Just showing one planet that looks ok doesn't disprove that the planet tech isn't buggy or broken sometimes.Look at this! The panetary tech is truly broken beyond repair!
![]()
Everything is flat! There are no mountains!
![]()
How scandalous!
Or so are people saying....
The video sure hit things bullseye.
It saddens me how many planets I've found have that exact same mini-volcano geography, in largely the same arrangement.Just showing one planet that looks ok doesn't disprove that the planet tech isn't buggy or broken sometimes.
Source: https://imgur.com/Gw85Jqo
Also, those "Mountains" in your second screenshot look more like hills. This is more like it.
View attachment 234241View attachment 234242
This BTW, really look like a heightmap artifact :Just showing one planet that looks ok doesn't disprove that the planet tech isn't buggy or broken sometimes.
Source: https://imgur.com/Gw85Jqo
Also, those "Mountains" in your second screenshot look more like hills. This is more like it.
View attachment 234241View attachment 234242
Very often. Look at obsidian videos, you can see that kind of mountain to.Agreed. But how often have you found such a structure? Personally I have seen none so far and I doubt they are as prominent as you seem to suggest.
One thing I don't understand is this strange Horizons nostalgia as if every single planet is a unique alien paradise. When I go exploring in Horizons, I ignore most of the landable planets (in that I scan them using the FSS but never bother to visit them). Seen one Horizon airless world, seen 99% of them. I make exceptions for those rare worlds that have unique features or unique orbits or unique biological life, but most planets in Horizons I find boring. And I'm okay with this, because I figure most planets in the IRL galaxy are boring, too.
My approach to Odyssey would be the same. Most planets I won't even bother traveling to, so I won't see their boringness up close. I save supercruise travel for those rare planets that look interesting, and I feel like Odyssey will have more of those than Horizons on the whole.
Maybe I'm just doing exploring wrong. If so, I'll turn in my "True Explorer" badge.
Oh come on! I can take a million screenshots in Horizons of featureless shiny brown plastic planets (and there are many of them). Is that what they all look like? Is that representative of Horizons planets? No, of course not.I do'nt think anybody put in doubt that you can make a pretty screenshots here and there. Which is even easier when you limit the field of view with those hills. It's about all the other places you don't take a screenshot.
Did you just skip the thread about heightmap issue I just made ? I also have many screenshots of the same crater copy pasted.Oh come on! I can take a million screenshots in Horizons of featureless shiny brown plastic planets (and there are many of them). Is that what they all look like? Is that representative of Horizons planets? No, of course not.
Conversely, I don't see why you are holding Odyssey's planets to such an impossibly high standard. They look much better to my eyes (and, as you may know, I'm no great fan of Odyssey). They are much more convincing as real terrain than the wild sawtooth mountains and valleys of Horizons.
For me it's going from 90~190 FPS in Horizons to 30-40 FPS in Odyssey. Not an exaggeration and doing apples to apples comparisons.Complaining about colors and lighting is one thing, but tahts not the issue here.
The problem is that we are seeing MASSIVE performance hits here. Going for 60~70 FPS docking at a station, down to freaking 30~40, is worth complaining about.
Forgiving and caring? That's a laugh.Congratz FDev you even managed to aggravate the explorers which imo was the most forgiving and caring part of the community. I mean i knew the planetary tech was broke but the shot comparison in that video sealed the deal for me.
Here is some free advice for Fdev. Don't promise to sell an Arabian horse to your customers if you are only able to deliver a beat up donkey.
I agree - I did have sympathy for the DW "leaders", but they themselves announced via Twitter that (paraphrasing here) "console users - no man left behind", meaning they were going to be waiting until everyone, PC and console users, had EDO and would start then ... Console users were delayed, so, is this not a case of "jumping on the bandwagon", meaning, everyone else has gone nuts over EDO, so why shouldn't the DW crew? Naturally they will be upset with the current state of EDO, but by their own admission, they wouldn't have set off anyway for at least 6 months as the console version is delayed .... so, why the drama from them?Feels like this guy is just venting frustration and tying DW into it for no good reason. There virtually was no chance that anything massive, community driven could happen after big expansion launch, where game will be utterly broken for 1-2 years at best. Guys really missed few good shots there...