DLC20 Discussion (maybe, but why not?)

To all PC players: was PC2 release a mess or was it a disaster? I tend to read mixed things from what you all post. Do you also think in time PC2 will be out of the weeds?
The release was a disaster, but most of the problems have already been fixed and the game has improved a lot. There are still some issues that need some work, but the game is becoming what most of us expected.
 
To all PC players: was PC2 release a mess or was it a disaster? I tend to read mixed things from what you all post. Do you also think in time PC2 will be out of the weeds?
I still don’t have a straight answer if cities skylines 2 is now playable or if its legacy is tarnished. I just remember what an irreparable disaster simcity was and how EA poorly handled it.
If we do get a PZ2 then they better test it a bunch and delay it if need be until they have a satisfactory game to be released.

“Disney world in 1956 nothing worked.” "Yeah, but, John, if The Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists."
For the most part PC2 is fixed but the damage caused has hurt the reputation of the game and the launch playerbase that aren’t dedicated have moved on. I wouldn’t say it’s as bad as Cities Skylines 2 or SimCity
 
To all PC players: was PC2 release a mess or was it a disaster? I tend to read mixed things from what you all post. Do you also think in time PC2 will be out of the weeds?
I still don’t have a straight answer if cities skylines 2 is now playable or if its legacy is tarnished. I just remember what an irreparable disaster simcity was and how EA poorly handled it.
If we do get a PZ2 then they better test it a bunch and delay it if need be until they have a satisfactory game to be released.

“Disney world in 1956 nothing worked.” "Yeah, but, John, if The Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists."
it was a desaster. Not a small mess. It was really in a bad alpha stage.
After last update it is in a good state, after next it will be in the stage I personally expected it to be at launch.

I will forever hate the new controls and new sorting of building pieces. Multi select is a nightmare, multi recolor is missing. Some things suck the fun out of me after plaxing PZ since launch. I hope Frontier gets back to the roots. Also: Plant quality is terrible with some.

That said: It's a game I could NOW recommend to theme park enthusiast, while personally still have not coped fully with the bad launch. It tinted my expierince.
 
Honestly, I'm curious how many of us would pay for PZ2 with, let's say, 80 species and a few updates like paths, birds.... Because if even a significant percentage of this community which is mostly made up of hardcore fans wouldn't buy it, then I can already predict the outcome.
 
Honestly, I'm curious how many of us would pay for PZ2 with, let's say, 80 species and a few updates like paths, birds.... Because if even a significant percentage of this community which is mostly made up of hardcore fans wouldn't buy it, then I can already predict the outcome.
if there are indeed flying birds and the avian system is good, then I think most of us will buy it. Of course, 80 Species vs. now 200+ species is a huge gap, but birds are THE MOST WISHED THING in PZ, so
 
Honestly, I'm curious how many of us would pay for PZ2 with, let's say, 80 species and a few updates like paths, birds.... Because if even a significant percentage of this community which is mostly made up of hardcore fans wouldn't buy it, then I can already predict the outcome.
Entirely depends on how they handle cut species. If they get added later for free? It's fine. If they're being re-sold, boycott.
 
I think the dumpsterfire PC2 release either means were not getting PZ2 at all or PZ2 is gonna be good.
PC2 was a flop, no matter how much effort they put into fixing it (which is admirable imo, they actually hold back on releasing DLC and focused of making the game good. Certainly cant expect this from any Company in this day and age), you have alot of potential players/customers that you just permantly lost due to the rough start. So thats a damage you cannot repair and it hurts you in the long run, not even if the game is the most amazing thing ever a year later.

So there really is no way i can see Frontier risk this happening again with a potential sequel to Planet Zoo.
Ofcourse this could also mean that we just dont get a sequel because they dont have the financial means to develope it.
This is a pretty accurate assessment but while frontier wont risk it again they have already irreversible damaged their brand with planet coaster 2 and since its also standard practice in the entertainment world to make sequels that do the bare minimum or are actively worse than its previous entry people are already assuming a ploanet zoo sequal will be the bare minimum.
Yes, I understood you exactly that way. I just listed things as comparison between good sequels and scamming sequels.

Frontier surely is far from EA, But I do get EA vibes with the last DLCs, as I said, and I hope they turn that around.

What we do know is that Frontier is a lot quicker (and better) in listening to feedback than EA.
I think that everyone is just expecting a scammy sequel because thats all that seems to be made currently which is the part of the problem.
My thoughts are Frontier is faster at listening to feedback because they are more at risk financially both due to not having as long or as strong of a legacy as ea and from the audience that plays their games being less willing to put up with garbage practices. they wouldn't still be making sims kits if they didnt sell and thats ultimately the problem no matter how much people complain people still buy sims packs.

Honestly, I'm curious how many of us would pay for PZ2 with, let's say, 80 species and a few updates like paths, birds.... Because if even a significant percentage of this community which is mostly made up of hardcore fans wouldn't buy it, then I can already predict the outcome.
If the updates are not significant enough to outway the loss of species I can also safely assume the outcome. A sequel would need to give more that just birds and paths for a drop in half the available animals to be worth it to the majority of players. This situation is however what most players expect. A mild visual improvement, birds, paths and 80 animals.
 
if there are indeed flying birds and the avian system is good, then I think most of us will buy it. Of course, 80 Species vs. now 200+ species is a huge gap, but birds are THE MOST WISHED THING in PZ, so
Aviary birds only really became popular after most of the major large animals were added if they add 10 or so birds then people are going to go right back to complaining about mammals. Given how aviaries are actually treated in zoos often with tons of birds that are generally left unlabelled from most zoo media the individual species wont actually hold hold much power in engaging people just the concept of aviaries and some specific exceptions like condors and eagles.
 
Honestly, I'm curious how many of us would pay for PZ2 with, let's say, 80 species and a few updates like paths, birds.... Because if even a significant percentage of this community which is mostly made up of hardcore fans wouldn't buy it, then I can already predict the outcome.
Depending on the 80 species roster, and updates.

I believe there could be good enough 80 species roster (in combo with fish and birds) for me to buy the base game immediately. Otherwise, I'm waiting for roster to bulk up, like with the PZ1.

I don't see how would (realistically) PZ2 had to look (or the DLCs) for me to not buy it at all.
 
Frontier has two decisions, bring birds and avian system while also not being absolute scummy or bring birds and a crappy avian system with removing half of the animals and making them dlc.
 
Sims 1 is still the best, in my opinion😅
Sigh... I'd love to see a modernized version of the original Sims... same simple gameplay, but with modern HD graphics and more assets... original Sim City too... could you imagine the original Sim City, but with expanded road and infrastructure options, education, water resource management, trash disposal and other modern elements to consider? Sounds so great...
 
Last edited:
Sigh... I'd love to see a modernized version of the original Sims... same simple gameplay, but with modern HD graphics and more assets... original Sim City too... could you imagine the original Sim City, but with expanded road and infrastructure options, education, water resource management, trash disposal and other modern elements to consider? Sounds so great...
SimCity Classic, 2000, 3000, and 4 are so much fun, totally would love those re-released and expanded
 
It's as unrealistic as having all the roller coasters, rides, and themes from PC1 on PC2, and that's exactly what's happening...

I can understand that not everything might be available from launch, but I think they can keep adding free content (which we've already paid for) with updates.
What good is it (in terms of diversity) to have flying birds and aquariums if I'm going to lose the land animals I already have? That way, I'll never be able to create a diverse zoo, let's say in South America. I'm going to have toucans and arapaimas, but I'm going to lose the ocelot or bush dog I just paid for...
Were you able to create a diverse zoo with the base roster of Planet Zoo, or Zoo Tycoon 1 or 2? Frontier needs the game to be profitable. If they bring back all the animals from PZ1 to PZ2 they'd have nothing to sell to casual crowds. We are wayyy past ABC animal territory.
 
I don't think it's quite that cut and dry. The vast majority of PZ's models are very good and, IMO, wouldn't need to be remade from scratch to have more interesting behaviours and animations. Even then, these would be universal changes across the board (assuming Frontier would update the animal models, which they've very rarely done across PZ and all 3 JWE games). If Frontier decides to re-sell wild boars while adding red river hogs to PZ2's base game and both species get the same changes made, where's the justification when both species have the same treatment? It's quite arbitrary and just reeks of desperation to make cash from people who have conceded too much ground.
Games are not made to be art, they are made to be profitable. The gaming industry in general, and Frontier specifically, are in a bad situation currently. How do you think they can make a profitable game in the current industry if they don't carve out spaces for DLCs like they did in PZ1 with leaving many ABC animals (and animals for the first game in the sequel) out of the base roster? How is that financial model supposed to work? And unlike JWE where they can just "invent" cool models because dinosaurs don't have a real life definite model, they can't do it with animals. They can't invent new animals to have demand.
 
Games are not made to be art, they are made to be profitable. The gaming industry in general, and Frontier specifically, are in a bad situation currently. How do you think they can make a profitable game in the current industry if they don't carve out spaces for DLCs like they did in PZ1 with leaving many ABC animals (and animals for the first game in the sequel) out of the base roster? How is that financial model supposed to work? And unlike JWE where they can just "invent" cool models because dinosaurs don't have a real life definite model, they can't do it with animals. They can't invent new animals to have demand.
Intentionally withholding content purely for profit is not going to work. Planet Coaster 2 showed us (and frontier) that. If there's a valid reason, such as improved animations, then at least you can justify it. I'd still expect over 100 base game species.

That said, this thread has got incredibly off topic, debating jurassic park movies and planet zoo sequels. In an effort to get back on track: what's everyone's choice, if you could lock in one species for the upcoming DLC? Personally, I know it's controversial, but I've gotta take the Asiatic Lion
 
Back
Top Bottom