1) A treaty with terms declared, and signatures from only one side, is not a treaty. It is a declaration of terms. Lave Radio never signed any treaty. They were presented with a treaty, they raised concerns, those concerns were dismissed, and that was all that happened.
2) At no point during the transition of power to Lave Radio, was brandy taken away. It was on the verge of happening, but did not. In fact brandy wasn't taken away until AEDC and AiD commanders were at top of the bounty boards in Lave.
3) Lave Radio's home system is in Lave, they are the only player faction inserted into Lave by Frontier, they didn't invade anywhere. Alliance player groups banded together a year ago to put a stop to Lave Radio playing the BGS in their own home system.
4) Just because AEDC and the other alliance player groups are larger, they act entitled to govern all BGS activities if ANY alliance npc faction is involved, in any system they deem worthy of interfering in, for whatever reason they choose. If it happens in another player group's home system, and they don't agree to AEDC's dictated terms, the smaller player group will have to "expect resistance" as AEDC has stated here. This is not diplomatic, this is bullying just because they are bigger and they act entitled.
If i draw up a treaty document, and declare that AEDC is not allowed to control any system that has an Independent npc faction in it, and sign it myself with some other Independents, does that make AEDC treaty breakers?