me and the boys when someone posts the wrong opinion about which animal to add to a zoo gameDon't beat me up
me and the boys when someone posts the wrong opinion about which animal to add to a zoo gameDon't beat me up
To be fair, wallabies are less diverse in international zoos. One Wallaby is a realistic expectation. Everything more is a bonus but unrealistic considering previous patterns.A lot of people are just saying "Wallaby" as if that's a species - Saying that one wallaby (or worse, just the red kangaroo already in-game) covers off the need for macropods is like saying just one antelope in-game would be enough. 'Wallaby' isn't a well defined term (pretty much just means smallish macropod) but any sensible list would include about as many exisiting species of wallaby as there are antelopes. Macropods are the primary megafauna of Australia - I by no means think we need as many macropods in-game as antelopes (since antelopes are far, far more common in zoos worldwide), but IMO at least two (one large "Kangaroo" and one small "Wallaby") that inhabit each major biome would be fine... Accounting for biome cross-overs, this'd be doable with about 3-5 species (i have essentially zero expectation that five would ever be delivered though).
Not really, wallabys come rarely alone. If a zoo has one species, theres a good chance they have a second with the benetts, parma and swamp wallaby being particulary common in europe.To be fair, wallabies are less diverse in international zoos. One Wallaby is a realistic expectation. Everything more is a bonus but unrealistic considering previous patterns.
Never seen a zoo with 2 wallaby species if it didn't specialise in australian animals.Not really, wallabys come rarely alone. If a zoo has one species, theres a good chance they have a second with the benetts, parma and swamp wallaby being particulary common in europe.
Hellabrunn Zoo in Munich has no special interest in australian animals and has:Never seen a zoo with 2 wallaby species if it didn't specialise in australian animals.
Never seen a zoo with 2 wallaby species if it didn't specialise in australian animals.
I don't think the average zoo has 6 bear species/subspecies either.Never seen a zoo with 2 wallaby species if it didn't specialise in australian animals.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love a ton of macropods, but we should realidtically adjust our expectation based on the last 3 years of DLCs.I don't think the average zoo has 6 bear species/subspecies either.
To be fair, the only pack since the Australia Pack that would have been suitable for a macropod* would have been the Conservation Pack (tree kangaroo), so I don't think we really have much to go off of so far. That said, I am also not realistically expecting much - a wallaby or two and a tree kangaroo at the most. I was mostly responding to how you implied that getting more than one species of wallaby isn't important because there is typically less diversity of wallaby species in international zoos, which is both debateable and feels dismissive towards Australian zoos. Not saying that this was your intention, but it's how it came across.Don't get me wrong, I'd love a ton of macropods, but we should realidtically adjust our expectation based on the last 3 years of DLCs.
Macropods are clearly not the highest priority for Frontier.
There are many of these actually.The swamp wallaby ls so funny to me.
Just imagine when the people that named it returned from australia to show people their discoverys just to go like
View attachment 331878
There are many of these actually.
The guinea pig is neither a pig nor lives in guinea.
The electric eel is not an eel.
The peacock mantis shrimp is not a peacock, mantis or a shrimp.
The mountain chicken feels left outOk, now I picture the Deceivers pack, with animals that have deceiving names:
New stand: buffalo wings
- Swamp wallaby
- Mountain goat
- Honey badger
- Maned wolf
- King cobra (E)
I actually considered them, but I feared getting attacked again by those who:The mountain chicken feels left out
I would hardly call that a deceiving name. It is a cobra, and it is the largest cobra.King cobra (E)
Apparently it's not an actual cobra, but closer to the mambas. Kinda like how the gray fox isn't a true foxI would hardly call that a deceiving name. It is a cobra, and it is the largest cobra.