Why is this in the playstyles section? Is Dangerous discussion full or something?
Apparently you’ve never been smashed to pieces by rotating station components while auto docking. It is dangerous.
Why is this in the playstyles section? Is Dangerous discussion full or something?
I know real pilots don't auto dock.
TIL im not a real pilot whatever the hell that means as its a game after all.
Autodock is too slow and doesn't understand peak performance like using shields as brakes. If doing carrier trades, you'll make 25%-30% more landing manually.
Is getting up to switch channels on your TV a challenge?
Who knew human beings enjoy convenience, eh?!
Try it after a few beers... It could be
Why, should it be?
Perhaps shunning convenience for macho is the thing...
Credit goes to Stanley Kubrik for his use of it in the movie "2001: A Space Odyssey". I've never seen the movie, but I have seen others referring to this clip:
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZoSYsNADtY
Not exactly.Real pilots absolutely use auto-dock - aka landing beacons. And autopilot.
I agree entirely - I was being light-hearted, should have added a wink!What I meant... since it’s trivial why make a big deal out of auto dock or not using it?
Most of my ships have autodock. It’s pretty useful when you have kids.
Auto is perilous...To be clear I don’t think anybody uses autodock because they think docking is perilous.
This is my idea to abolish ramming and pad blocking. New rule: if you collide with another ship and you're not under autodock control, it's your fault. Draconian? Me?Leave him be.
He doesnt seem to know that the real pilots have to use autopilot to fly the plane.
And in certain circumstances the have to use it to land the plane too... else they are not allowed to land the plane at that airport
In fact, piloting in Elite is almost the polar opposite of todays commercial aviation.
This is my idea to abolish ramming and pad blocking. New rule: if you collide with another ship and you're not under autodock control, it's your fault. Draconian? Me?
That lasts only until hackers and terrorists figure out how to hack into and control these autonomous vehicles. It's already happened. Some Chinese hackers had demonstrated how to control an autonomous vehicle remotely. This incident was probably a benign one in which the hackers may have been trying to help the manufacturer make their system more robust. However, it is only a matter of time before malicious entities decide to cause real harm.Not quite
For in system flight we have SCA for flying to destination (which offers auto-orbit or auto drop-off to stations) then request docking clearance and let the computer dock
Guess it's safe to assume that the stations that allow autodocking have the full ILS/LPV systems
Guess that's already in place, not to assign the blame but to remove it (if you are under autodock and collide/ram the speeding status is discarded)
IMO i guess we will get there with our cars in sometime.
We will be forced to let the cars drive on auto most of the time and i'm pretty sure the number of traffic accidents will be drastically reduced.
Sometimes I've wondered whether engineering the thrusters catches the autodoc by surprise. I wonder if it's calculating moves using the ship mass and assumed thrust, and the assumed thrust doesn't take engineering into account.I'm taking my racing Ieagle for a fly today and I realized that the autodock AI is terrible to it. I don't know if it's because it's ways faster than an usual ship but it bump on pad almost everytime before landing.