If I wanted a 'radio-tuning' game I would have rather bought an old radio.

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
And no amount of telling me how almost everyone, apart from 'a few whiners', absolutely loves it, is going to me make me like the FSS in its current incarnation.

Probably cause its blatently untrue. Its just that most players are willing to put up with it or dont care enough to make a fuss. It is my beleif that nobody is going to tolerate the FSS on long range exploration. They either wont use it or wont go.
 
Why cant you be kind and support us?

Because you dont deserve it. If you can recall, I did spend time and energy on a proposal that would help people who dont like the FSS. I am absolutely for any solution that would help normal people have more fun. But spamming whiners who feel their opinion is so much more important than those of anyone else that they feel compelled to spam their single opinion every single day, every week: they dont deserve any support. Where at first people were sympathetic, they then became indifferent. And eventually it flips to amusement. :)

So: the FSS is fun. I am very happy it is in the game. :)
 
Because you dont deserve it. If you can recall, I did spend time and energy on a proposal that would help people who dont like the FSS. I am absolutely for any solution that would help normal people have more fun. But spamming whiners who feel their opinion is so much more important than those of anyone else that they feel compelled to spam their single opinion every single day, every week: they dont deserve any support. Where at first people were sympathetic, they then became indifferent. And eventually it flips to amusement. :)

So: the FSS is fun. I am very happy it is in the game. :)

With the greatest respect to all posters and their ideas, nobody asked for a proposal. Most of what i have seen is unlikely or impossible and either way would need time. I cant speak for others but i wanted the old ADS patched back in as a module. In whatever form makes people happy so long as i can then continue blazing my trail. Sinse that hasnt happened i guess im going to have to wait and see if player numbers will drop or not and if that will sway FD.


BTW. All the time i spend posting on here is time i really wish i was spending in game. :(
 
Last edited:
Probably cause its blatently untrue. Its just that most players are willing to put up with it or dont care enough to make a fuss. It is my beleif that nobody is going to tolerate the FSS on long range exploration. They either wont use it or wont go.

Right on cue, here I am to prove you wrong. I left Shinrarta on update day, nearly 7 weeks ago, on a voyage to the edge of the galaxy, on a purely Explorational trip, to circumnavigate the edge of the galaxy. A trip I would NOT have undertaken with the ADS because the ADS method of Exploration was terrible and ruined my fun. Since I am sombody, not nobody, your belief is thereby proven incorrect.

As exhibit B, I give you the DW2 event, one consisting of over 10,000 players, also on long-range exploration missions. Now I will not claim they are all fans of the FSS on anyone's behalf, but they did, in fact, go on such a trip, and are also not nobody, but somebody, and not an insignificant amount of somebody.

So while I will not tell you what to or not to believe, I can and will tell you that your belief is as incorrect as believing my cat is the messiah. Not that this will somehow bring you into the light and joy that is the FSS any more than the latest advances in science will bring the Amish into the 21st century, but time itself has not stopping passing for them either.

So you and the rest of the Elite: Amish are free to make as much or as little noise as you like, while the rest of us, and I believe "us" to be an overwhelming majority, will keep regarding you as quaint anachronisms longing for the past.
 
Last edited:
That's why arguing about personal preferences is pointless.
And yet, here you are.

Hasn't this really been some 186 pages worth of arguing about personal preferences though?
The Elite: Amish prefer the ADS, prefer less data with their scans, prefer to fly 1000's of light seconds to see that a ball of ice really is a ball of ice, while the rest of us prefer to have our data with our scans, not have to fly to the butt-end of a system to a planet 1.5 Huttons from where we entered, to make that same determination, and wish for the last 120 minutes of our lives back? I mean, really, isn't that exactly what this all comes down to?

Edit: Stig'd.
 
Last edited:
We not you.

Hasn't this really been some 186 pages worth of arguing about personal preferences though?
The Elite: Amish prefer the ADS, prefer less data with their scans, prefer to fly 1000's of light seconds to see that a ball of ice really is a ball of ice, while the rest of us prefer to have our data with our scans, not have to fly to the butt-end of a system to a planet 1.5 Huttons from where we entered, to make that same determination, and wish for the last 120 minutes of our lives back? I mean, really, isn't that exactly what this all comes down to?

Edit: Stig'd.

Here's the thing though - I've not been arguing against you (both) liking the FSS. I accept that you do, and I even understand why. Instead, I've spent the vast majority of my time explaining WHY I don't like it, and discussing the many suggestions for ways in which FDev could change things to suit both camps. That's a lot more productive (assuming FDev are listening) than calling people names and telling them that their personal preferences are wrong or that they're wasting their time.

So yeah, this thread is 98% pointless, but I'm not the one making it so.
 

Scytale

Banned
There is obviously a degree of self-delusion here, presuming that a few people moaning is going to influence F D one iota. If a whole cacophony of voices opposing the inclusion of CQC rating in the UI screen gets ignored, what do you think a handful of Luddites is going to achieve over this?

Good try !
 
(I just have to point out I am no luddite. It's just that the FSS is really lame.)

Thank you.

Lol at the usual suspects turn up to reply :)

As i said, all the antis can do is "no it isnt" eg, the FSS is terrible and ruined my fun. No it isnt you are a luddite. Why cant you be kind and support us? Everybody should be free to blaze their own trail no? You wouldnt even be able to tell the difference between a ship with one or the other way of scanning so why do you care?

Don't get me wrong, in the Beta I said (and still think) it would be better if the FSS was an additional tool built-in to a (perhaps simplified) disco scanner.

What I am saying is that after nearly three thousand posts, over 180 pages, people are still deluding themselves if they think that a small number of people unwilling to adapt to the system which has been implemented will make any difference to Frontier's approach.


BTW - Luddite - "a person opposed to new technology or ways of working" - so yes it is a particularly apposite epithet (I am not intending it as an insult in case people think that).


Further point re the "usual suspects" remark - I think that is a bit rich from someone with 268 posts in this thread. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Further point re the "usual suspects" remark - I think that is a bit rich from someone with 268 posts in this thread. :rolleyes:

It was practically a ritual of summoning, no? :) I bet if i made another thread you would be in that one aswell. BTW i was told by frontier support staff to post in suggestions, altho you soon managed to make a circus out of that thread and now its sank safely out of sight. Shouting people down and pushing threads off the forums. Thats why we need this one. I dont see the relevance of my post count either, i made a post way back saying my postcount would be held against me. Claiming that all my posts are moaning about the FSS is untrue.
 
Don't get me wrong, in the Beta I said (and still think) it would be better if the FSS was an additional tool built-in to a (perhaps simplified) disco scanner.

What I am saying is that after nearly three thousand posts, over 180 pages, people are still deluding themselves if they think that a small number of people unwilling to adapt to the system which has been implemented will make any difference to Frontier's approach.


BTW - Luddite - "a person opposed to new technology or ways of working" - so yes it is a particularly apposite epithet (I am not intending it as an insult in case people think that).


Further point re the "usual suspects" remark - I think that is a bit rich from someone with 268 posts in this thread. :rolleyes:

I know full well what the word luddite means. I embrace new technology and heartily welcome new ways of working - except... when they're crap.
 
It was practically a ritual of summoning, no? :) I bet if i made another thread you would be in that one aswell. BTW i was told by frontier support staff to post in suggestions, altho you soon managed to make a circus out of that thread and now its sank safely out of sight. Shouting people down and pushing threads off the forums. Thats why we need this one. I dont see the relevance of my post count either, i made a post way back saying my postcount would be held against me. Claiming that all my posts are moaning about the FSS is untrue.

There we go again - really you just can't accept that I am not opposing what you dream of, just pointing out how much effort you put in to complaining.

Re the suggestions thread, again I didn't oppose the suggestion, just questioned the tactic of using that method in addition to your profuse output. Of course you had to suggest that people should only make posts in support of a suggestion so I ripped into you over that.

... 'bye


P.S. Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice
 
I know full well what the word luddite means. I embrace new technology and heartily welcome new ways of working - except... when they're crap.

Yep. Same here. Last night i was buggying around for what turned out to be about 40 mins in the end.. had to get to the bottom of the creator or bust..

Elite is a barely strung together collection of refined mechanics. Its almost like unix / linux in that sense.. you build a solution (or experience in elites case) based on the sum of its parts, and because each individual part is perfect for what it does, the end solution itself turns out elegant because of the ingredients.

The fss is the first gameplay experience they've built without any depth. Its rewards obsessed and has nothing else going for it.

And before the nutters chime in.. the people with issue are the people who had more going on with prior exploration than just pressing the honk.. obviously the great majority never arrived to that state.

Yes, it is the same group who adores WW2-era Germany, conspires with the mod team, secretly bulk-purchases the game to artificially boost it sales numbers and is now silencing you by bumping this thread.

Amazingly self aware :) Good stuff.
 
Last edited:
Yep. Same here. Last night i was buggying around for what turned out to be about 40 mins in the end.. had to get to the bottom of the creator or bust..

Elite is a barely strung together collection of refined mechanics. Its almost like unix / linux in that sense.. you build a solution (or experience in elites case) based on the sum of its parts, and because each individual part is perfect for what it does, the end solution itself turns out elegant because of the ingredients.

The fss is the first gameplay experience they've built without any depth. Its rewards obsessed and has nothing else going for it.

And before the nutters chime in.. the people with issue are the people who had more going on with prior exploration than just pressing the honk.. obviously the great majority never arrived to that state.

One of the most ridiculous things I have read on here for a while.
 
Mind if I explain, Scytale?

If I can just give you a quick run through...

There's a variety of issues at play, and they're all getting tied in together.

Firstly, what you need to know is that bodies only appear after the honk if they've previously been discovered (as in been Level 2 or Level 3 scanned and had the data handed in to UC) by another cmdr.

What that means is that for bodies or systems which have not previously been discovered, the only way to find the bodies is via the FSS.

Now, the second point is that the FSS effectively takes you out of the cockpit into another view, and as above that becomes unavoidable.

So here's the problem(s):

- For some exploration is about flying their ship - they can't explore undiscovered systems that way any more

- Some people simply really don't like the FSS interface - again they can't avoid it for undiscovered systems (or bodies)

- For others exploration is primarily about finding unique system configurations (say like 5 level nested orbits), or peculiar/unusual planetary situations (binaries in very close/fast orbits) and things like that - previously these could be identified relatively quickly by looking at the system map after the honk. As per above though, that's not possible for undiscovered systems and people have to scan the system via the FSS before they can see the system map. The primary issue here is that because these people are looking for things which are very very rare, they are looking to optimise the search, which means taking the minimum time in what to them are non-interesting systems - having to fully scan the system via FSS before viewing the sysmap can mean they're held back significantly.

And in addition, for some it's a combination of the above.

Anyway, I hope that all makes sense - could you let me know either way?

(Also, for everyone else, if I've missed anything significant, please chip in.)

Well that certainly deserves a reply, it makes sense and thanks for the response:

- I really don't like the way that the scanners take you out of the cockpit, especially as someone that plays exclusively in VR but I find the new system so much better overall that it is the lesser of two evils.

- If someone has been to a system and scanned it then taken the data back and uploaded it universal cartographics it makes sense that everyone can see it. Without that what is the point of exploring.... the old system made no sense.

- If for some exploration is purely about flying their ship they can just not honk at all and use the really old parallax and get close method.

- For people trying to find unique system configurations (which isn't something I've ever tried to do like you have explained) I can't see a way around that other than if the honk populated the Orery map only and only with bodies, their positions and orbits. That way the real detail would still be a mystery without the FSS but you could tell if there was something that might float your boat.

I find the exploration changes have made it much better. It's not perfect, I'd like all the FSS and DSS stuff to be on a curved screen like the station interface (for example) but the way it all works I really like... including the radio tuning.
 
How is the old way not repetitive?
There is repetition and there is repetition,

if the original system was repetitive the new FSS system is the same level of repetitive at least to the power of 3. Adding mechanics to a repetitive activity does not fix repetition, often it only makes it worse.

IMO the original system was only repetitive for certain play styles, the FSS is repetitive for everyone essentially. It adds unjustifiable grind and is poorly implemented overall.
 
Last edited:
There is repetition and there is repetition,

if the original system was repetitive the new FSS system is the same level of repetitive at least to the power of 3. Adding mechanics to a repetitive activity does not fix repetition, often it only makes it worse.

IMO the original system was only repetitive for certain play styles, the FSS is repetitive for everyone essentially. It adds unjustifiable grind and is poorly implemented overall.

How is it one thousand times more repetitive? When you jump into a system does it happen one thousand times or do you have to jump one thousand times more often to do the same thing?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom