It would seem that the Imperial combat(?) forces at Omumba have now merely switched targets - and given the lesser difficulty of this system appear stand a fair chance of success mostly alone! It’ll be interesting to see how this goes.
I reckon they’ll be successful, if not after one week, then probably on the second.
Indeed if Omumba can reach half that way, that amount of activity would bring HR 2204 to 95%! Of course, 66% per week would give the two-week outcome. That said, if it does well over the weekend then I would be
very happy to support it when next in session; around 50% by Monday evening should become a safe completion, and around 40% by then is fine if we can rely on continued activity.
Their target list for controls published on DCoH lists Vasupari as the priority target(doesn’t seem to be so closely followed), with HIP 30502, Montioch and the above HR 2204 as the others. If anyone was curious.
That list—also including Omumba earlier—is stated more simply as all inhabited systems at M. Hadad!
- Vasupari can be evicted without assistance (~8.9k).
- HR 2204 is fine to receive impromptu assistance (~14.4k).
- HIP 30502 is best coordinated such that planned harvests occur for delivery in the same week (~21.1k).
- Monitoch is best scheduled ahead so that we can have some harvest cargo ready in advance (~29.9k).
Sampling has barely been mentioned, if at all
This part interests me a lot! I remember well how proudly the salvage-tracking was announced in Frameshift Live #24 around one week before that update at the beginning of February, the Research products falling into the salvage class of course, then indeed there has been not a mention of it since. That said, for Frontier to present that more Orthrus-hunting should occur, Frontier
must have been watching the types of activity and cannot have missed the disproportionate Megaship deliveries believably.
To an extent I imagine it difficult to mention because it lacks still a reason why it would help to win a system, but mostly I imagine there is an element of having formal, official ways to suggest that more of some activity should occur but not that less of some other activity should occur. That leaves actions, inactions and how things feel generally, where their prevention of further actions in completed systems and their increases to Research rate both feel as if we are supposed to care only about winning and only about using the quickest way to do it.
The inaction while the activity (dis-)proportions are presumed known also sends a message to me, although as you say regarding the means not being part of the long-term plan, I wonder whether Frontier might misinterpret the uptake of Research as enjoying the activity over enjoying the outcome!