The Galactic Mapping Project & Historical Archive of Exploration

OK, i don't know what the deal is, but now there are 2 NHSS on the first planet again! I don't know how Odyssey spawns these things, but I have seen NHSS on the planet 4 out of 6 times I have been in this system... I'll add "possible non-human signal source" to the description.
unknown.png
unknown.png
 
There have been occasional reports of planetside NHSS-es since Odyssey came out, from seemingly all over the galaxy. It's probably just random.
 
New High Gravity Record (?)
Hypiae Aurb AA-A g588 A 1 with a surface gravity of 11.6g
Not my discovery, it was posted on Reddit today ....
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/o9p4s3/lithobreaker_isnt_the_highest_gravity_planet/

Discovered for EDSM by "WESTBOUND" in Jan, there have been three ships passing through in the last week.
I'll be making a trip out there to land on it soon.
Update: Landed there last night
Source: https://youtu.be/7MwlJeFzPVc
 
Last edited:
Hello Cmdrs!

DSSA Right Ascension replaces DSSA Reginleif out in the Kepler's Crest wilderness. Grateful for an update to the POI/EDSM and anything that's applicable. :)

Carrier’s Insignia
APSZdGW.png

RWI
Carrier NameDSSA Right Ascension
RegistrationJLL-BQZ
Carrier ClassDrake-Class
Designated RegionKepler's Crest
SystemDryau Aec JF-A d11
Commission DateApril 4th 3306
Carrier Construction DateAugust 11th 3306
Construction LocationKepler Gateway, Kruger 60
Maiden Jump(s)LFT 300 for fueling (August 11th 3306)
In-service DateJune 29th 3307
Services AvailableRepair, Refuel, Armory, Shipyard, Universal Cartographics, Redemption Office
Tariff % Set7%
Commodities Bought/Sold on CarrierCoffee, Tea, Liquor, Beer, Wine, Tobacco, various minerals and metals,
rare items, anything radioactive etc
Nearest Tritium HotspotSpliergh BD-U b58-0 ( 20.20 Ly )
Carrier InfoDSSA Right Ascension (CMDR Rollo Rhadium) replaces DSSA Reginleif (CMDR DreadTom) after the latter's 1 year of service in this the central part of the Kepler's Crest region.

This DSSA station is now sponsored and commissioned by Rackwheel Industries and carried out by its squadron Rackwheel Industries Survey Co. (RISC).
With the addition of a refueling station and a redemption office the same excellent services as previously will be available for travellers in the southernmost region of the galaxy. DSSA Right Ascension will be present in the system for at least a year to fullfill the commitment for the DSSA-initiative #30.
Screenshot
R3Vjo24.jpg
 
Hello Cmdrs!

DSSA Right Ascension replaces DSSA Reginleif out in the Kepler's Crest wilderness. Grateful for an update to the POI/EDSM and anything that's applicable. :)

Carrier’s Insignia
APSZdGW.png

RWI
Carrier NameDSSA Right Ascension
RegistrationJLL-BQZ

Updated. And thanks!
 
New High Gravity Record (?)
Hypiae Aurb AA-A g588 A 1 with a surface gravity of 11.6g
Not my discovery, it was posted on Reddit today ....
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/o9p4s3/lithobreaker_isnt_the_highest_gravity_planet/

Discovered for EDSM by "WESTBOUND" in Jan, there have been three ships passing through in the last week.
I'll be making a trip out there to land on it soon.
Update: Landed there last night
Source: https://youtu.be/7MwlJeFzPVc

Great find! Pity it doesn't have an atmosphere. You would think something with that gravitational pull would have one.
 
How do i get an EDSM entry for the system I submitted? I am returning to the bubble after 110 day expedition to Beagle and Erickson's and would like to commemorate the occasion with the discovery of the Kyloagh PE-G d11-86 system I submitted.
 
How do i get an EDSM entry for the system I submitted? I am returning to the bubble after 110 day expedition to Beagle and Erickson's and would like to commemorate the occasion with the discovery of the Kyloagh PE-G d11-86 system I submitted.

They're periodically reviewed by the GMP/EDSM team, but not all submissions are added to EDSM. Also I think the review process is on hold until after the console release of Odyssey as its possible there'll be further changes to the planetary and galaxy tech which could effect current entries.
 
Just a heads up that the last of the large-scale Horizons-era expeditions is launching on July 10th 2021. This will likely be the last chance for explorers (on an expedition) to visit Horizon's POIs, some of which were recorded for the GMP, going back 6 years.

Example..

david.jpg




Apollo 15 Anniversary Expedition - organized by CMDR Yanick


50 years ago Apollo 15 became the highest point of exploration in the first era of space.

Today we're celebrating it with the Apollo 15 Expedition.

It's also likely to be the last big Horizons era expedition before the tech is lost forever, and we'll be seeing out this era of exploration in style! A Horizons last hurrah if you like 🙂

We're welcoming players of all levels of experience in exploration.

Starting July 10th, ends August 1st

Link:
FleetComm discord channel: #apollo-15-expedition

We'll see you all there!
o7
CMDR Yanick

All questions/discussion about this expedition need to be sent to CMDR Yanick, either via forum PM, or the discord channel mentioned above.


 
Last edited:
I've snagged updated photos of Lysooh AQ-G d10-145 (Siamese Twins), if that's of interest.

I also noticed the description is slightly incorrect. It currently reads "The first two moons of the first gas giant in this system..." - it's not the first two moons that are close together, it's the gas giant's first moon and subsatellite that are close together.

Here are the photos. The first from the moon looking towards its submoon and planet, the second from the submoon looking back at the moon.

The system is still very pretty.

Source: https://imgur.com/a/1PsWISO
 
Greetings

I'm doing a bit of scouting for an upcoming expedition and I'm visiting the POI's that are along the route.

However, some POI's are really unimpressive, almost as if they were added just because. This has raised upon several questions.


Is the requirement for Neutron stars being relatively close to each other that low to become a POI? I understand this is not a core region but it's a bit underwhelming as region to be even considered a POI. In that case, I do have a zone that could be a POI by itself. However, I want to know if the line is this low to qualify a region as a POI?


This one is not even funny, How 2 very far away stars (16kls relatively to the scale of how our solar system is) close to each other considered a POI? I understand the scientific significance this might have, however this is not uncommon event from a B class system to occur. Specifically with how these bodies are distant from each other.

Is not that I think they should be removed or anything, I'm just wondering if the line is that low to be considered a POI for the GMP list. Because, for expedition purposes, these "POI"s are either unimpressive or as the GMP mentions bellow "notability". Mostly because for what I've read, the line is pretty high with some of the recent additions and well, these do not seem to be around that line.

Even if they might be historic, they are a bit underwhelming as they are. Quote "Why would I travel 16k ly to see a semi binary B class?"
 
Last edited:
Greetings

I'm doing a bit of scouting for an upcoming expedition and I'm visiting the POI's that are along the route.

However, some POI's are really unimpressive, almost as if they were added just because. This has raised upon several questions.


Is the requirement for Neutron stars being relatively close to each other that low to become a POI? I understand this is not a core region but it's a bit underwhelming as region to be even considered a POI. In that case, I do have a zone that could be a POI by itself. However, I want to know if the line is this low to qualify a region as a POI?


This one is not even funny, How 2 very far away stars (16kls relatively to the scale of how our solar system is) close to each other considered a POI? I understand the scientific significance this might have, however this is not uncommon event from a B class system to occur. Specifically with how these bodies are distant from each other.

Is not that I think they should be removed or anything, I'm just wondering if the line is that low to be considered a POI for the GMP list. Because, for expedition purposes, these "POI"s are either unimpressive or as the GMP mentions bellow "notability". Mostly because for what I've read, the line is pretty high with some of the recent additions and well, these do not seem to be around that line.

Even if they might be historic, they are a bit underwhelming as they are. Quote "Why would I travel 16k ly to see a semi binary B class?"

They're historic, and pre-date the stipulation you quoted in your last line. Both of these entries are over 5 years old, and date back to when the GMP was in its infancy. I think they even pre-date Horizons content, a time when the only entries were stars, nebulae, clusters, or interesting (for the time) regional features. Compared to today, there wasn't a whole lot of interesting POIs to add to the project until Horizons came, so the rules of entry were much more lax back then.

Those two POIs you mentioned are a product of their times. One is actually already archived (which means it was deemed uninteresting or obsolete a while ago. The GMP won't ever delete entries, no matter how uninteresting they are compared to today's standards, so we archive them instead). The other is a region feature - not strictly a POI. Regional features were a special category introduced by Corbin Moran in the early days of the GMP (circa 2015/16) to basically try and give some flavour text to the galaxy (which didn't even have regions until the GMP introduced them. Frontier later incorporated their own in 2018 and adopted several of the GMP regions into the game). The entry you mentioned was a sort of proto-idea of introducing regional texts to the community map when there were none, and therefore could be thought of as the seeds that lead to the galaxy getting a regionally named overlay like it has now. In that context we hope they still hold some historical importance to the community.

The standards for POI entry has been raised little by little over the years as the game evolved and new game content was added, but yes, those particular entries you linked aren't that interesting today, and definitely not worthy of POIs to use as waypoints or anything. They're historical, and are a product of their times. And as mentioned, the GMP often archive such entries as and when the next clean up comes along, as one of the goals the GMP had from day one was to record the evolving history of exploration and preserve it as best as possible, no matter how obsolete old entries become over time! :)
 
Last edited:
They're historic, and pre-date the stipulation you quoted in your last line. Both these entries are over 5 years old, and date back to when the GMP was in its infancy. I think they even pre-date Horizons content, a time when the only entries were stars, nebulae, clusters, or interesting (for the time) regional features. Compared to today, there wasn't a whole lot of interesting POIs to add to the project until Horizons came so the rules of entry were much more lax back then.

Those two POIs you mentioned are a product of their times. One is actually already archived (which means it was deemed uninteresting or obsolete a while ago. The GMP won't ever delete entries, no matter how uninteresting they are compared to today's standards, so we archive them instead). The other is a region feature - not strictly a POI. Regional features were a special category introduced by Corbin Moran in the early days of the GMP to basically try and give some flavour text to the galaxy (which back then didn't even have regions until the GMP introduced them. Frontier later adopted their own and incorporated some of the GMP regions into the game a few years later). The entry you mentioned is a sort of proto-idea of introducing regional features to the community map when there were none, and therefore could be thought of as the seeds that lead to the galaxy getting a regional overlay it has now. In that context we hope they still hold some historical importance to the community.

The standards for POI entry has been raised little by little over the years as the game evolved and new game content was added, but yes, those particular entries you linked aren't that interesting today, and definitely not worthy of POIs to use as waypoints or anything. They're historical, and are a product of their times. And as mentioned, the GMP often archive such entries as and when the next clean up comes along, as one of the goals the GMP had from day one was to record the evolving history of exploration and preserve it as best as possible, no matter how obsolete old entries become over time! :)
Yeah, you just slapped me with the teacher ruler here Erimus. Eh, sorry if I was a bit frustrated is that I was expecting a lot and felt I super bummed when I didn't found something really cool like other POI's. You explained yourself pretty well.

This is not the first time I've been dealing with this, I should perhaps calm myself down with questioning historical entries.
 
Name:Icarus and Daedalus
Game map search ref:Prua Phoe DG-V d3-11 3a
Description:A single barren moon offers a spectacular view of two ringed binary planets. One of them landable the other not. The close vicinity to the systems main star gives an extra spark to the stunning vista.
Screenshot reference:
Prua Phoe DG-V d3-11 3a.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom