The name of the target in the blurred panel seems too long
RMX7vAT__01.jpg

Image forensics also returned some blurry artifacts over the target:
f7d3a51ca075469973321ee4587556c719186a4b.870863-ela-600__01.png

But the cockpit also got this blurred effect around it:
f7d3a51ca075469973321ee4587556c719186a4b.870863-ela-600.png


Not sure what it worth...

Also the user don't have any other pictures posted on imgur and seems to have created this account just for this ones.
 
There's too many thargoid sympathizers in the galaxy. Im not one to support genocide but when it comes to humanity vs tharganity , I know which side im on.
Typical human mistake. Once we speak about local animals, we must support them and take care, because we evolved together and cannot live on Earth for too long if we change too fast animals present (that what we see actually now - covid19 happened because we broke animals balance, because without helping "home" animals and airplanes virus had no chances to spread so wide and fast.).
Any way, thargoids is different story. They're not part we need to live. They are threat. So you can stop here altruism and act as protecting from threat. If they fill like they're dying species they can start to talk to us, until then no mercy.
 
Hmmm...was farming imperial ranks ...got mission from "mysterious stranger" to find & scan some crashed explorer....
Sounds like DW ...

Damn, google says that: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threads/mysterious-stranger-tip-off.382789/
I.e. .... nothing special >:

...but it seems perfect place to hide dw ... like do 20+ such a missions and DW will contact you ... maybe I will bother some to do, it can be triggered doing couple missions to new fraction each time.
 
Last edited:
Hello Commanders,
just regarding the most likely hoax discussed previously, OP of the picture uploaded 2 pics actually.

Source: https://i.imgur.com/RMX7vAT.jpg

Source: https://i.imgur.com/3gkVkMW.jpg


and made a "statement":
"i was expecting doubt. i dont mind it. here is a cool fact: raxxla speaks. i wont be giving any clues, or bother with any further proof. "

I never really did photo forensics but I tried, did not really discover anything so maybe one of you could run it and check how much the second pic could be adjusted?

o7
 
Hello Commanders,
just regarding the most likely hoax discussed previously, OP of the picture uploaded 2 pics actually.

Source: https://i.imgur.com/RMX7vAT.jpg

Source: https://i.imgur.com/3gkVkMW.jpg


and made a "statement":
"i was expecting doubt. i dont mind it. here is a cool fact: raxxla speaks. i wont be giving any clues, or bother with any further proof. "

I never really did photo forensics but I tried, did not really discover anything so maybe one of you could run it and check how much the second pic could be adjusted?

o7

Personal opinion is its balderdash.

In most situations one can apply simple logic to distinguish fact from fiction.

Such information, as is submitted here, can be best described as 'unreliable' and the source is certainly 'unknown'.

If you follow the standards for attributing confidence to investigative intelligence, information only becomes reliable once it can be said at best to be 'known directly' or 'indirectly but corroborated'. Anything lower is untested or unreliable.

Certainly unreliable or untested information can be enough to support an assessment, or a degree of confidence if said information was submitted / obtained multiple times via separate trusted sources, but even then it would be best described as having a low degree of confidence.

You also have the poor structure of data which here, has been edited, namely blurred and is of low quality that initially makes it wholly unreliable as information.

Looking at the data in a colour enhanced format only confirms the likelihood this is false information, although this can be attributed to its poor quality rather than manipulation. So at best if we think it has been manipulated we can class this also as 'suspected to be false'.

I agree the theory Raxxla has already been visited by multiple Cmdrs is plausible but the number must be marginal at best, seeing as no one else has leaked anything consistently, the submition of information here and like this, may be in keeping with such clandestine acts, but there is no indication of this, so it maybe safe to assume impling this is someone simply seeking public acknowledgement, a claim to fame.

Cryptographic meaning only adds suspicious intent to the source, it does not confirm it. If you want people to believe you, most people will give up all information in some form, even if its includes false information as information is power.

Here its marginal, they are holding back information. They are retaining their control.

But this is not real life, its a game so real life equivalents may not be applicable, as we cant assess the age nor intent of the source.

Given them the benifit of doubt, e.g. if we acknowledge our own bias and treat the information as initially true, then the first image still tells us nothing, as it is edited, it is simply an unsubstantiated claim.

If I were to do something simular, my initial thought would be, I cant publish this image, not without editing it first, because someone will be able to use it to find the location. However by editing it I heavily flavour my intent as being innately suspicious. So I wouldn't actually post it, unless of course I was either immature and unaware of such things or my intent motivation was contrary to actually finding Raxxla.

The second image however can be interpreted multiple ways, their cryptographic statement is interesting. But only in the fact that its open ended.

Again if I wanted to give a hint, one wouldn't simply show where it was, a large field shot, such as this, could be said to hold the location. A cryptically rye statement may also act as a compass barring... but again it lacks corroboration, considering the first image is so poor.

Within my profession we'd be inclinded to say this intelligence smells.

Personally if I wanted to confirm its discovery there are far more elaborate and imaginative ways of doing this, two grainy low quality screen shots is insufficient in my 'professional' opinion.

Of course they could be right.... but again there isn't sufficient information to warrent further assessment.
 

Attachments

  • PSX_20200426_162344.jpg
    PSX_20200426_162344.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 288
Last edited:
The people who make the fake Raxxla hoaxes are doing it for one single reason: Attention. There's literally no other reason to make a fake hoax, they get their views and they get off on it. If they actually found Raxxla they'd post the actual location because they'd go down in Elite history and get TONS of attention for it.

It's happened so many times, it really doesn't need to derail the thread for two pages lol
 
Did anybody try already to do "mysterious stranger" quest many times, like 20-30-50 ?
Google found some people do 5-7 times and said it is trash. But it seems very convenient option to hide DW there.
As I understood, each time you do 4+ quests for some new fraction (for u) you may get that random invite. So it fits DW lore - getting 30 such invites proves you're "elite" as you did many quests.
 
Last edited:
Did anybody try already to do "mysterious stranger" quest many times, like 20-30-50 ?
Google found some people do 5-7 times and said it is trash. But it seems very convenient option to hide DW there.
As I understood, each time you do 4+ quests for some new fraction (for u) you may get that random invite. So it fits DW lore - getting 30 such invites proves you're "elite" as you did many quests.

When you say “quests” do you mean “missions”? Particular types of missions?
 
Leaving this here ... Probably nothing but I am not in a position to investigate/validate...
Source: https://twitter.com/EliteDangerous8/status/1254385295736180736


Well this is the very first time I knew if you put in a star name in the Galaxy map it auto corrects to another star name. On PS4 at least. Also I don't think it's a complete troll. He did find something.

Typing in hip 4427 in the Galaxy map auto corrects to 27 gamma cassiopeiae.
 
It doesnt necessarily autocorrect. It will take you to a system that starts with whatever was typed or has whatever was typed in system like a planet or station name. For example if you type of Meredith City into the search bar lft 926 will come up. If you type PSR and search you can keep searching it'll cycle through all of the psrs.

Edit: Also some/most if not all stars have multiple designations. they're listed on its info
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom