If their funding tracker can be believed they are getting around $3 million per month on average.
Allegedly, there is in the region of 10,000 new backers per month. The new backers realistically account for no more than $750,000 so the current backers are dumping around $2.25 million per month on this vanity project.
I know, depressing isn't it, especially when you have other promising games, like Camelot Unchained, who have only managed to raise $4.4 million in 4 years.
Why is it a lie? We know that as of July last year they had 500,000 backers which results in around 11,000 per month on average.
If 75% of each month's backers buy the base package at $45 with the remaining spending $150 we get $750,000, which leaves $2.25 million from the exisitng playerbase.
jrg99
Chill a bit my friend. I think Zetta is on your side of the support or not support SC discussion. Your approach to discussion may just drive people away from this often informative thread
The information is money vs. space sim fans.
Space Sim fans is not BACKERS! So, yes. The math is wrong because of that in the first place.
Let's try to make this clear. What I said, in the first place, it's that the calculation was used to try to paint, to make a conclusion, to try to figure out a reality of this project (regardless if been skeptical or not). That's why I said it's POINTLESS. Because regardless the math, its using wrong basis and its objectively and mathematically WRONG.
Pointless was the word that I used. Meaning that adds absolutely NOTHING to the discussion or to approach to the reality, because the counter, used in the calculation is PROVEN to be bogus and wrong.
Proven by who? By ANYONE with internet access enough to check what Roberts said and one of his associates said, things that were said in 2013, 2015 and late 2016. Besides proving that the counter was bogus and they didn't have the number of backers that they appeared to have (which means that using that number to make averages IS POINTLESS and WRONG (because you can't OBJECTIVELY get the money acquired and tie that to accounts that didn't pay a DIME, for god sake), it also proven that CHRIS ROBERTS LIED... for YEARS!
So, Zetta tried to say that there is no proof that they lied, even that the prove was shown to him/her. And the prove was indicated by himself/herself. And that is why his denial became hilarious as I said.
Pretty much. This seems to be a debate between the “CIG's numbers are cow manure” standpoint versus the “CIG's numbers are cow manure, and also untrustworthy” standpoint. It doesn't strike me as an entirely constructive line of discussion.
jrg99
Chill a bit my friend. I think Zetta is on your side of the support or not support SC discussion. Your approach to discussion may just drive people away from this often informative thread
Defintely, it's one thing to flat out state that something is a lie and another to say it looks like a lie but there is not enough proof to be 100% certain.
True. And you could just take out the stress from the equation, and just assume that it's all a lie.
Drunks of Sol approve!
Unfortunately, I've got about 8 hours to go before a refreshing maintenance spray or two Friend of mine has just finished a new build and wants to try Star Citizen in 4k and attempt VR - so that's tonight planned out
It'll be interesting to see how SC performs - from what he's said his machine will make mine look like a ZX Spectrum.
Defintely, it's one thing to flat out state that something is a lie and another to say it looks like a lie but there is not enough proof to be 100% certain.
You people need to go out for a beer and smoke.
The idea that they are getting, on average, 300 or so additional paying backers day in day out, for years on end does seem very dubious. I feel a lot of the issue is how there are no clear metrics for the project. Everything is bloated and obfuscated by a variety of means which makes it really hard to get a proper picture of what is exactly what.
I wish I could find the post which recorded the backer increase for Elite prior to it releasing on Steam for a bit of a comparison.
I'd bet that the counter is completely fake.
No there is NO actual proof of anything.....You can said that CRoberts is clown,liar,gamester,you can even call him a "thief"&"scammer"(I personally call him many things... )but one thing's for sure he ain't that stupid to leave his fingerprints all over on"murder weapon"....+@Zeta just pointied on "alleged"numbers that are presented for the public nothing more,nothing less....you from the other side making an projections in your head and trying to convince her&all of us that "Earth is Flat"because you said so....Well... There is actual proof. And what is hilarious here is that you prove that yourself, when you said that they had 500k backers (or something near of that) last year. For years, before such "announcement", they were claiming to have more than that. TWICE that number!
Do you think the reported developer numbers are faked, too? If not, where does CIG get all that money to pay them?
I don't think, but they certainly don't need $150M just for developers
I'd bet that the counter is completely fake.