So while the clock keeps on ticking, everyone keeps talking.
No-one is actually DOING anything.
All it takes is ONE UA taken to Paterson Enterprise at Sirius and sold on the black market.
If I had a UA myself, I'd have sold it there already this evening.
Col 285 Sector WA-L b9-3 ?
If the plump lady is indeed clearing her throat, why not?Simple thinking.
News: local shutle crash because UA is onboard.
Closest local planet is Waypoint.
UA has a GPS. Where do you take your GPS?
To the Waypoint.
Last day. Simple clues. Simple solution.
Simple thinking.
News: local shutle crash because UA is onboard.
Closest local planet is Waypoint.
UA has a GPS. Where do you take your GPS?
To the Waypoint.
Last day. Simple clues. Simple solution.
News: local shutle crash because UA is onboard.
UA has a GPS. Where do you take your GPS?
To the Waypoint.
.
What about trying to use a Docking Computer on a UA? Using a docking computer while we have a UA? Or just simply boosting-boosting-boosting around Sirius? There's also the fact that the UA has "similar chittering to stations" from what I've heard, that could mean that the docking computer mistakes the two (thats why it boosted the ship in the news, UA was outside, it tried to reach it maybe)...
I don't think we know that the UA has a GPS.
It reports the name of the nearest significant object. This could be a star 1000LS away.
A GPS tells you its own position. The Ua tells us the name of something its near. Similar...but different.
With the galnet article, I read it before reading too much in here and honest, it just sounded like they galnetified bugs with the docking computer (a fair few other threads reporting bugs with their ship boosting into the station wall while using the docking computer)
With the galnet article, I read it before reading too much in here and honest, it just sounded like they galnetified bugs with the docking computer (a fair few other threads reporting bugs with their ship boosting into the station wall while using the docking computer)
Yes - except for the links to Antares and SS1 - which were deliberately pointed out.
Hmmm..
There could be a testable link to the UA and SiCorp... The colonised systems changed their names, right? What if the UA Morses the original name or the new one? If it taps out the original name, perhaps we can rule out a SiCorp connection? If it taps out the new one, it doesn't help (we don't know where its getting its data from)
+rep for both of you!
I like it!
UA bearers, ^^^^^^ way to go!!!!
I agree.
I'm just trying to think real simple stupid as it may be the last day of the mystery ;-)
Umm, except why are Federation and Imperial convoys carrying the UAs around? [cue Sirius working in league with INRA theory]
Umm, except why are Federation and Imperial convoys carrying the UAs around? [cue Sirius working in league with INRA theory, or even Sirius is front for INRA theory - see Mycoid virus, etc.]
And except (for the third time now), I've been there and deployed the UA there and docked at the station and checked that out too...
Check my sig if you want to see a video.... Ceos.
And we have no evidence that either of those ships had a UA on board either.
It possible of cause that the missing ships is just set up for the introduction of some new game mechanic that will arrive either with 1.4 update or in the expansion pack and nothing to do with the UA announcement. bed time now.Quite true - I think lots of us have been assuming that the 2 mysteries (UA and missing ships) are linked in some way - but there is no direct evidence of it at all.
If the UA is going to be explained tomorrow (if) it seems odd for Galnet to deliberately bring up the missing ships thing again. Its either accidental, coincidental or deliberate. If they just wanted to talk about docking computers - why bring up the link to missing ships?
Dunno - It might be coincidence - but....Dunno....
If the UA is going to be explained tomorrow (if) it seems odd for Galnet to deliberately bring up the missing ships thing again. Its either accidental, coincidental or deliberate. If they just wanted to talk about docking computers - why bring up the link to missing ships?
Dunno - It might be coincidence - but....Dunno....