I mostly roll a human in roleplaying games for a really different reason. I think there is so much about humanity to roleplay, I'm nowhere near feeling like I've 'run out' of human characters to play with. For the most part, RPG non-humans are just a way to focus on one particular aspect of humanity anyway... and sometimes I feel like that pushes me to play either a stereotype, or a character who's defined by subverting the stereotype.So does no one itt just feel like playing something or someone different to real life? To me there's not really a roleplaying or gender identity component, it's just fun to make a variety of characters.
Or are you all the types who will always roll a human in Dragon Age, because "how can I sympathise with an elf, let alone a fe-male"?
But that's the problem: what he said was sick, whatever your interpretation of his intention. If I said something racist I would expect to be pulled on it, not glossed over because you want to spare my feelings.
Anyone who thinks that objectification does not demean that person needs therapy. He either needs to learn the right language for what he wants to get across or not talk at all. And this was the issue at hand at that point in the discussion: boys having a girl on their bridge to fantasise over.
Too late...
- - - Updated - - -
They're here!
Don't make me talk about my 21 STO characters and their crew. Harem...(clothing included.)
About this? I don't disagree, neither going to agree, for a simple reason. Al trough i can understand some of their pain, but sure as hell i can't agree with the rights defender hysteria around these sort of subject, mostly because of the reason of my understanding of their problem, and also because i know right defenders very well..
For my part? They are just another when the hunting season starts group, and the hysteria some of this whackos generating around LMBTQI subject? Reason to shoot!
This part of the post is particularly important: "mostly because of the reason of my understanding of their problem"
In other words, "I don't understand it, and I'm going to perpetuate my own wilful ignorance and choose not to try and understand it, and attack instead."
Not at all. I play elves in many games, as well as various kinds of alien in others. I roll female and male characters, though the majority tend to be female.So does no one itt just feel like playing something or someone different to real life? To me there's not really a roleplaying or gender identity component, it's just fun to make a variety of characters.
Or are you all the types who will always roll a human in Dragon Age, because "how can I sympathise with an elf, let alone a fe-male"?
The quotes I picked out, and the subject following from the OP, are not about people's nuanced relationships with their wives.
The statements quoted are creepy (IMO) because they're fixating on the sexualisation of women's bodies.
I agree there are many reasons why a male might choose to go with a female character, and most are not at all misogynistic reasons, but my issue is with the subset of those who admit that their sole reason for choosing a female character is to provide them with sexual titillation, which yes I think is a misogynistic attitude.
Not sure if you have ever been in a room full of women or overheard a group of women talking. Now I am going to ruin your perceptions of that fairer sex, they objectify men in the same tones as men do with women. When it comes down to it all we are sexual creatures and without that drive then the human race would of gone extinct many thousands of years ago.
Not sure if you have ever been in a room full of women or overheard a group of women talking. Now I am going to ruin your perceptions of that fairer sex, they objectify men in the same tones as men do with women. When it comes down to it all we are sexual creatures and without that drive then the human race would of gone extinct many thousands of years ago.
I'm reasonably sure that the 'genderswapping-for-masturbatory-sex-kicks' contingent have much more in common with my 'dude-carrying-a-sexdoll-around-town-to-fixate-upon' scenario, than they do with people who have real-life conversations with actual people about who they find attractive [haha]
And where is that contingent you've conjured up? I don't see them represented here.
Quoted a few, in my post that you replied to earlier. Keep up!
Given that you're speaking for all men/boys/males, why would you say that is?
(I'm ignoring your avatar for the moment and giving you the benefit of the doubt.)
To be clear, you think:Quoted a few, in my post that you replied to earlier. Keep up!
At least I assume they are guys, with cmdr names like John, James etc.