UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

I have no idea what the practical use of phase shifting is to help us solve the puzzle but you might be on to something:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:8PSK_Gray_Coded.svg

The rabbit hole goes deeper!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constellation_diagram
 
Last edited:
I have a worry that much of this good effort being put into searching the surface may be in vain....

Kinda wondering if the EMP pulse is dual purpose - sure it knocks us out enough to transmit it's message/map/thing but... reading the diagram a certain way it could be saying take the UP to that place and honk it to use the EMP to knock out a cloak device and reveal The Thing be in on the surface or in orbit not sure, but those UA's are sending their signal to Some Thing
 
I just thought of a test; (apologies if it has already been tried)

(Test needs 2 CMDRS)

CMDR 1 - could pilot the same ship type as the military transport that contained it (python i think, (for mass reasons)) and also carries a UP with a UA and the same number of meta alloys and reactive armour as the military transport.(just in case) any other ship is worth trying too.

CMDR 1 and 2 enter orbit of merope 3c and drop UP (magnetic field?) (maybe reach certain speed?) CMDR 1 initiates countdown for frameshift drive (any destination)

CMDR 2 times his honk (by synchronising countdown with CMDR 1 (you will have to count, and factor in the number of seconds delay from honk to distortion), to cause the UP to create this distortion; just as either the 4 seconds to jump is counting down or, a second or 2 after the jump.(before the bang noise from jumping )

Could this force a misjump?

The 'extracted from UP' image could be a map to overlay on galaxy map to show where you will be going.

If it has not been tested, a livestream, 'if possible' would be amazing.

(awaits the 'read the front page comments')
 
Last edited:

Yes a different time Braben said there would be A Wormhole. Although he never said as a use of shortcut but he did say there would be ONE at one stage. From then he said there wouldnt be shortcuts but he never said there wouldn't be wormholes. The wormhole itself could be a "once off" experiance hence not a shortcut put a single instance travel to which you must make your way back
 
Yes a different time Braben said there would be A Wormhole. Although he never said as a use of shortcut but he did say there would be ONE at one stage. From then he said there wouldnt be shortcuts but he never said there wouldn't be wormholes. The wormhole itself could be a "once off" experiance hence not a shortcut put a single instance travel to which you must make your way back

Would be interesting as a Beacon so that you can travel exactly to near the centre of the galaxy from anywhere. So not real fast travel but could cover half the distance from Sol to Jacques and back again in one go. I'd be okay with that.
 
Yes a different time Braben said there would be A Wormhole. Although he never said as a use of shortcut but he did say there would be ONE at one stage. From then he said there wouldnt be shortcuts but he never said there wouldn't be wormholes. The wormhole itself could be a "once off" experiance hence not a shortcut put a single instance travel to which you must make your way back

ignoring all that, I put the bold mark between 4 very specific words: in the source code.

it is easy, either you elaborate what source code means for you, you chose your words appropriately to avoid misleading and you stop talking about file peeking -and what is more important- using it to argument something.
 
Last edited:
@LordZoltan and rizal72:
Yeah, I would have been surprised if nobody had that idea before ;-) But better to point at the elephant in the room than ignoring it ;-)

> Hope to see more posts from you in the future
Maybe if I find more time to play (or at least the time to catch up with this thread)
 
ignoring all that, I put the bold mark between 4 very specific words: in the source code.

it is easy, either you elaborate what source code means for you, you chose your words appropriately to avoid misleading and you stop talking about file peeking -and what is more important- using it to argument something.

That was a qoute from the site i linked. That was not my statement
 
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: ilo
Gents, ladies, please turn your attention to this wiki article. It fits everything we know so far:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_code

The symbols, the circle, 'a key', and its historical use in mathematical puzzles!

ehhh the only reason a Gray code would fit is that he invented it so his rotary encoder wheels wouldn't glitch out. There's nothng inherently round or circular about a gray code.
Besides, part of the problem we have is we have things that look likr binary info, but that really can't be because there isn't enough variation. If we take only 4 numbers of binary and switch them to the gray versions, we get 4 other numbers, but still 4 :(

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Is anyone here that created that UP Test spreadsheet linked on the first page? Are you still updating it or have you given up?
 
I'm just beginning to suspect you're a troll. You don't really believe any of what you're posting, there's no way you can because there's nothing there.






He was asking for everyone's feedback on his theory, which has been repeated in various forms at least 3 times & my thought was the same each time, hence my repetition.








My I offer my sincere apologies. I do believe in my solution posted in simple form at post 5333, and i tried to put it simpler at post 5390. I remain convinced the bottom right panel is an alien face adjacent to a human face. Post 5412


I promise not to post again this theory unless there is incontravertable proof. I would like to thank the community for their extended patience with my enthusiasm. If this is correct, the idea is the product of the community, i would not have got there on my own. Tinfoil hat salute. '


Bosch Out.
 
"Now, a few words on looking for things. When you go looking for something specific, your chances of finding it are very bad. Because of all the things in the world, you're only looking for one of them. When you go looking for anything at all, your chances of finding it are very good. Because of all the things in the world, you're sure to find some of them." - Daryl Zero - ​The Zero Effect (1998)
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom