Why would Salvation need to be behind it?That was one thought I had when Alexandria went missing.... maybe Salvation was behind it.
Why would Salvation need to be behind it?That was one thought I had when Alexandria went missing.... maybe Salvation was behind it.
We know next to nothing about Salvation. was just one of the thoughts about the situation and the possible outcomes of the story. IMO, it'll probably be found with either a thargoid "mothership" or home world. but the possibility of Salvation being involved can't be overlooked at this timeWhy would Salvation need to be behind it?
I would guessAZB2 - Azimuth Beacon #2?
I give it til tomorrow afternoon.So, approx. 100 ly from this beacon should be the next. This "event" might actually take until Saturday before being solved
It's possible that the ship drifted for quite some time before it finally stopped after the fuel was burned out.Maybe I'm missing something. Was the Hesperus not already found? If so, would that not be the last position and the crew escaped from that system? So would the survivors be 300ly from where the Hesperus was found and not 300ly from the last beacon?
It's possible that Pharmasapien moved the Hesperus somewhat between their capture of it and Velasco killing them all. Probably not very far, but there is a nine-day gap between Kelemen abandoning ship with the Azimuth survivors, and O'Neill returning to find everyone dead, so I wouldn't rely on them having kept it in the same system either as with the beacon trail it might have risked an Azimuth team counter-attacking.Maybe I'm missing something. Was the Hesperus not already found? If so, would that not be the last position and the crew escaped from that system? So would the survivors be 300ly from where the Hesperus was found and not 300ly from the last beacon?
EDIT1: Would the survivors not try to get back to the bubble & help than going the other way and further in to the black?
2MASS J03291977+3124572 (Ring Mine) is the closest that EDDB lists, 80 LY out, and that's definitely been there for a while ... then the next nearest is the various Alliance California settlements. Why, what did you find?Weird question but: was there always a population near the NGC 1333 nebula?
Ring mine2MASS J03291977+3124572 (Ring Mine) is the closest that EDDB lists, 80 LY out, and that's definitely been there for a while ... then the next nearest is the various Alliance California settlements. Why, what did you find?
Theres a few in and around the Cali nebula.... As many Nebulae around the galaxy, mainly asteroid bases and panetary settlements, added a few years agoRing mine
And I'm guessing the independent near California is also accounted for.
I just noted the independent as it wasn't an Alliance system. Not that it matters. I was trying to be smart and filtering for only populated regions. Maybe it could work, but clearly not if I'm doing it.Theres a few in and around the Cali nebula.... As many Nebulae around the galaxy, mainly asteroid bases and panetary settlements, added a few years ago
I just noted the independent as it wasn't an Alliance system.