Thank you so much! It's working perfectly for me.
[Application] EDJP and EDJPO
- Thread starter MattG
- Start date
Thank you so much! It's working perfectly for me.
Hi there, I've got the screen popups working at a good place now, while using 3 screens and 5760 x 1080 resolution, thanks.
"IndentLeftPopup": 1950,
"IndentRightPopup": 3800,
"IndentLeftPopup": 1950,
"IndentRightPopup": 3800,
It should be the Message Overlay option that needs unticking - but maybe I've broken something. I will try and verify it next day or 2, and fix if needed.
Ah cheers, yeah I've definitely got that unticked but they're still showing.
Hello MattG,
I have a question regarding your app EDJP. When I try to start it on my system, my virusscanner tells me that the application might be malicious.
W32/Malware/DeepGuard.zg
Could you please explain what you are doing in your app that could result in this alarm?
CMDR Prins Hugo
I have a question regarding your app EDJP. When I try to start it on my system, my virusscanner tells me that the application might be malicious.
W32/Malware/DeepGuard.zg
Could you please explain what you are doing in your app that could result in this alarm?
CMDR Prins Hugo
A quick google bring up this.
Some of the things that might cause an app to be flagged are:
- Adding, editing or deleting files
- Downloading files from a remote website or server
- Connecting to a remote website or server
- Transmitting data to a remote website or server
EDJP creates log files, configuration files, a bunch of JSON files to track things like seen journals, and a bunch of commander-specific data files to track activity
EDJP makes a bunch of API calls to do things like check latest version, grab latest ELW rarity data, check if ELWs already exist in the List of ELWs, a while bunch of EDSM calls, calls to spansh for neutron routing, and probably a bunch more I am forgetting.
That seems like such a ludicrously low bar for deciding whether to flag an app, but there you go. I have run an additional scan of my PC (with Windows Defender) and it finds nothing so it comes down to trust - do you trust Defender accurately scanned my PC, and do you trust me to not do Bad Things
. I do not publish the source code for EDJP so if you cannot emphatically say 'yes' to both of those then you should probably remove EDJP from your system. Don't worry, I won't be offended 
Where do you create all those files?A quick google bring up this.
Some of the things that might cause an app to be flagged are:
- Adding, editing or deleting files
- Downloading files from a remote website or server
- Connecting to a remote website or server
- Transmitting data to a remote website or server
EDJP creates log files, configuration files, a bunch of JSON files to track things like seen journals, and a bunch of commander-specific data files to track activity
EDJP makes a bunch of API calls to do things like check latest version, grab latest ELW rarity data, check if ELWs already exist in the List of ELWs, a while bunch of EDSM calls, calls to spansh for neutron routing, and probably a bunch more I am forgetting.
That seems like such a ludicrously low bar for deciding whether to flag an app, but there you go. I have run an additional scan of my PC (with Windows Defender) and it finds nothing so it comes down to trust - do you trust Defender accurately scanned my PC, and do you trust me to not do Bad Things
The application does not have his own directory or anything.
I have given your application to F-Secure for investigation and I hope to learn what the cause of this error is.
When we have this information, it might be a good idea to modify the application in such a way that it prevents these messages.
CMDR Prins Hugo
It creates a DATA and Log folder in the location it is run from (or attempts to, anyway), and creates files within those folders.
Yeh, no. EDJP isn't doing anything nefarious - it's creating files necessary for it's operation, and it's making web calls necessary for certain functionality (I think most or all of those can be disabled though). I'm certainly not wasting any effort to not have F-Secure flag the app
. They are of course welcome to modify their application in such a way that it prevents these messages .Regardless of what F-Secure have to say about EDJP, I'd suggest you're probably better off with one of the open source apps you can audit and compile yourself, such as EDDiscovery, or EDMC.
I think I've fixed this - please grab the 2.1.9 beta from here and give it a try (you want the smaller beta link under the button). Messages should be suppressed when the option is ticked, but FSS Overlay should still work.
Let me know of any problems.
Yeh already looking at it but thanks for the headsup. Another wonderful change to fix... what?
Now to come up with a way that allows Journals to be sorted in correct order that doesn't rely on created/modified timestamp, nor filename now. Might have to concede and just go for created time. Ugh.
OK, I've put a new release up that should accomodate the new filename format.
I've not had as much time to test as I'd have liked - please let me know if you encounter any issues.
I've not had as much time to test as I'd have liked - please let me know if you encounter any issues.
Seems to work, thank you!
In case you didn't already - grab 2.1.10 release instead, as it fixes the issue introduced by Update 11 for Odyssey having different format Journal naming.
Thanks, came here for this and it was already fixed, you're the boss.
By the way, bit of a feature request here, it'd be awesome if I could check certain boxels within the boxel explored as already explored/surveyed to give me a better a idea of what places I've scanned within the sector I'm in. Anyway thanks for the quick update!
I don't know if this will be possible - but can you elaborate a bit more on what you mean here, and how it would work?