It's the early 1900's, Ford have released the Model T. It has 20HP and no doors. The Model T evolves, eventually getting doors and windows enclosing the occupants while still allowing a near full view around the car.
It is the late 1900's, cars now have larger windows allowing a large view (especially the rear) and a review mirror to reduce the strain of looking behind. Even basic cars can produce upward of 80-100HP.
It is now, cars have cameras which allow the driver to see directly behind the car. More expensive models have cameras that can see all around the car. Renault even presents a concept car which has a built in quadcopter to fly off and check why the traffic queue has happened (
http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/renault-kwid-concept-car-has-its-own-drone-we-kwid-you-not/) - even I have a quadcopter at home that allows me to see through a video camera on the front (thus allowing me to see me in the 3rd person).
I don't understand after only what 100 or so years of development, we have got to a point where looking out of a car window is not our only source of visual information about the world around us, that after 1000 years we would have gone backwards to only being able to look out the front of a space vehicle?
Today cameras are cheap and the computers that control the systems are getting cheaper and more powerful. I don't see it as far fetched that a ship from the 34th century (which is capable of superluminary travel no less) would be covered in cameras, giving it a 360 view of its surroundings in both planes. Nor do I see it as far fetched that between that view of its surroundings, and a 3D simulation of itself, that it couldn't create a live 3D external view of the ship in the space it currently occupies.
NASA gave the arm on the Shuttle a camera so it could check the underside of the vessel for damage during take-off. They have also been looking at having Smartphone powered 'flying' robots for the ISS. Having an external view can be important in real life on a space-vessel (damage assessment), is it so far fetched that in 1,200 years time a space ship would have an upgraded ability to view itself?
What do we want? Realism? Because we would have to be rid of the superluminary travel for one, or maybe the artificial caps on top speed, or the artificial gimping of the yaw axis. Or do we want believability? As long as an external view is done in a believable fashion (external drone, 3D computer simulation etc), then why not have it?