Because ED might move to 4.0 soon, so got to stay ahead of ED, because bigger numbers mean the game is better.
Star Citizen Discussion Thread v11
- Thread starter Sir.Tj
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
- Status
Because ED might move to 4.0 soon, so got to stay ahead of ED, because bigger numbers mean the game is better.
Unfortunately that is probably 100% true.
Source: https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/1245453181812977669
Any truth in it? Or just an April Fool's joke from Mr S?
It’s probably like all Derek’s ‘Breaking News’. Unverifiable, probably unverified, and unlikely ever to be spoken of again
It’s fun to note that the Crytek settlement and the share option could fit that narrative though, if you wanted them to:
- Share options taken up (Jan 31st) - 17m heading to CIG
- Joint claim that settlement negotiations since Jan 10th have gone well (Feb 6th)
- Settlement finalised (March 23rd)
- Share options declared to Companies House (March 27th)
Of course, it fits a ‘Oo, the Crytek case is going away, time to buy in!’ narrative as well. So pick your poison
LOL
Roadmap Roundup - April 3rd, 2020 - Roberts Space Industries | Follow the development of Star Citizen and Squadron 42
Roberts Space Industries is the official go-to website for all news about Star Citizen and Squadron 42. It also hosts the online store for game items and merch, as well as all the community tools used by our fans.robertsspaceindustries.com
Can’t imbed due to swears, but word from the evocati is...
Double F...
Is the Shell-of-an-Idris Battle still a Once-Per-Account event?
How do they expect repeatibility testing?
How do they expect repeatibility testing?
LOL
Roadmap Roundup - April 3rd, 2020 - Roberts Space Industries | Follow the development of Star Citizen and Squadron 42
Roberts Space Industries is the official go-to website for all news about Star Citizen and Squadron 42. It also hosts the online store for game items and merch, as well as all the community tools used by our fans.robertsspaceindustries.com
Because fleshing out secondary stuff obviously takes priority. Lots of pixels need recoloring hehehe.
Look at the armchair developer knowing better then CIG how to get stuff done /scoff
- I m sure they have a strategy and an answer. You simply are not "worthy" to receive one.
(once they arrive at the point you describe)
- Nobody could ve known, CIG tried their best but they are in uncharted waters, doing gamebreaking stuff nobody else did ever before.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
As reliable as CIG roadmaps, announcements or CR vision and promises.
I thought it was interesting that both sides paid their own legal costs.It’s probably like all Derek’s ‘Breaking News’. Unverifiable, probably unverified, and unlikely ever to be spoken of again
It’s fun to note that the Crytek settlement and the share option could fit that narrative though, if you wanted them to:
- Share options taken up (Jan 31st) - 17m heading to CIG
- Joint claim that settlement negotiations since Jan 10th have gone well (Feb 6th)
- Settlement finalised (March 23rd)
- Share options declared to Companies House (March 27th)
Of course, it fits a ‘Oo, the Crytek case is going away, time to buy in!’ narrative as well. So pick your poison
Smells very much like to avoid public win/lose analysis in event of payout...
Of course in CIG's case "paying their own legal costs" means "giving another fat chunk of backer money to CIG co-founder Ortwin Freyermuth."
As for "avoiding public win/lose analysis", I'm not saying I'm a modern day Nostradamus, but:
One thing is true. SC lost money and dev time.
They didnt need any lawsuit for that, they are doing it fine by themselves.
Also unless DS can exhibit somehow leaked settlement documents he's just pulled that claim out of where the sun doesnt shine.
As for the cancelled Idris battle in 3.9 patch all i can say is
Yeah, haven't played for weeks. Mainly due to the bugs in 3.8.2 plus no signs of 3.9 PTU appearing anytime soon... but also due to watching the Mandalorian on Disney+...as well as Toy Story 3 and 4 ...and some of the Marvel stuff I don't already own.They didnt need any lawsuit for that, they are doing it fine by themselves.
Also unless DS can exhibit somehow leaked settlement documents he's just pulled that claim out of where the sun doesnt shine.
As for the cancelled Idris battle in 3.9 patch all i can say is
My wife even watched the CGi remake of The Lion King...surprising as that was to me... since we already knew the script of the damned thing off by heart from watching the first one several thousand times when our kids were young. Hakuna Matata and all that
I would be amazed if CIG'sPer LegacyKilla at 6:50, Covid-19 has now gifted CRobbers the perfect excuse to slip SQ42 & PU to fall quarter of next year
Which isn't a bad thing from a MVP perspective come to think of it....
Last edited:
Per LegacyKilla at 6:50, Covid-19 has now gifted CRobbers the perfect excuse to slip SQ42 & PU to fall quarter of next year
Which isn't a bad thing from a MVP perspective come to think of it....
Why? They have excused slipping for 6 years without any sort of pandemic and backers celebrated by giving them more money.
... and when you consider that CIG drops a new quarter pre-alpha "patch" that supposed to have cost $10M, I ask myself: what are doing the other 499 dev? The glacial progression of the last years may not be impacted by the pandemic.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
I would be amazed if CIG'sbeggingdonation business model survives the financial crisis created by covid-19. It was already wobbling before. Of course the funding chart goes on unperturbed.
Not only unperturbed so far but in the opposite direction to the rest of the world´s economic meltdown.
- Status